Laserfiche WebLink
for '95, '96, and '97 in total and <br />still not quite have enough. We're <br />going to have to look at other <br />funding sources, as they arrive. <br />The 3/8% is a potential for the <br />acquisition of the land. The <br />increased sales tax revenue from the <br />new shopping centers on McCaslin <br />are, also, a potential for the land <br />and for the park development. We <br />can't include those in a five year <br />budget, because they haven't <br />actually happened. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Can we then delete the question of <br />successful passage and indicate that <br />other alternatives may be available <br />for viable funding bases? <br /> <br />Mayer stated that without the passage of the 3/8% sales tax, the <br />community park is unlikely to come about in the foreseeable future. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />We're spending almost $2 million on <br />a ballfield complex. I originally <br />envisioned that being part of a <br />community park. I think Hwy. 42 and <br />96th Street are sneaking up on us <br />much more quickly than we know. The <br />State is going to have to jump in at <br />some point and address the issue. I <br />think the 96th Street interchange <br />and U.S. 36 is going to force us to <br />address that issue. I'm suggesting <br />that we start spending some money to <br />address 96th Street and how it gets <br />through Louisville. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />If someone wants to suggest that we <br />spend money on a study, you'll have <br />to suggest a specific amount and <br />we'll consider that. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />(INAUDIBLE) <br /> <br />Lathrop stated that $5,000 would probably tell Council the <br />extent .... <br /> <br />Phare: <br /> <br />If you were to do a full blown <br />corridor analysis, you could easily <br />be spending $50,000. If you want to <br />just look at some particular issues, <br />$5,000, $10,000 would work. But, if <br /> <br /> <br />