My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 01 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 01 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2016 8:04:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 01 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br />January 19, 2016 <br />Page 4 of 25 <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Maloney inquired whether the roadway would actually be open in six <br />months or would the bridge just be replaced. Public Works Director explained the six <br />months benchmark is when the project is complete and the roadway is open. He <br />stressed the opening would be contingent upon the weather. <br />Council member Maloney noted Hamilton was the low bidder. He asked Public Works <br />Director Kowar for his comfort level with this construction firm. Public Works Director <br />Kowar stated he was very comfortable with the firm. Because it is a CDOT project, it <br />came with more requirements. He noted any of the bidders would be qualified to <br />complete the bridge project. <br />Council member Stolzmann explained this is a huge priority for the City Council and the <br />Public Works Department. She felt there should be a City Council study session where <br />Council could look at the results of the flood and the lessons teamed. She stated the <br />bridge will cost one million dollars less than expected, and she wondered if Council <br />would have waited this long to have the bridge replaced had they known the actual cost. <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to award the bid for the 95th Street Bridge Replacement <br />to Hamilton Construction Company in the amount of $1,817,175.20, authorize a project <br />contingency of $181,717.52, and authorize the Mayor, Public Works Director and City <br />Clerk to sign and execute contract documents on behalf of the City and approve funds <br />for additional design and construction management services for Michael Baker Jr. Inc., <br />per their proposal fee of $47,582.17. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem <br />Lipton. Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 7 -0. <br />Mayor Muckle referenced the process and noted this is the last really big construction <br />project resulting from the flood. He voiced his appreciation to the Public Works <br />Department, City Manager's Department and all the Departments for their work on the <br />flood recovery projects. <br />6TH AMENDMENT TO THE TAKODA GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />(GDP) AND THE FOUNDRY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) <br />HIGHWAY 42 AND PASCHAL DRIVE <br />1. ORDINANCE No. 1712, SERIES 2016 — AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN <br />AMENDMENT TO THE TAKODA GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (GDP) TO <br />REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PCZD -C TO PCZD -C/R— SECOND <br />READING - PUBLIC HEARING <br />2. ORDINANCE No. 1713, SERIES 2016 — AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE <br />VACATION OF VARIOUS EASEMENTS ON LOT 1, BLOCK 9 AND TRACT T <br />OF TAKODA SUBDIVISION, AND LOT 2 OF SUMMIT VIEW SUBDIVISION — <br />SECOND READING - PUBLIC HEARING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.