My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agenda and Packet 2016 01 27
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
RECREATION/SENIOR/AQUATIC CENTER EXPANSION TASK FORCE
>
2016 Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agendas and Packets
>
Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agenda and Packet 2016 01 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:07:14 AM
Creation date
2/11/2016 2:17:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RSACETFPKT 2016 01 27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NOTE: LIST ORDER IN EACH TIER WILL ROTATE RANDOMLY IN ONLINE VERSION OF SURVEY <br />Lou of Louisville Recreation Center Expansion Study: Draft 1 <br />COLORADO) • SINCE 1878 <br />15. The improvements listed above have been sorted into three tiers based on their expected costs. Understanding that expected costs vary <br />by type of improvement or expansion, please select your TOP PRIORITIES to add or improve in Louisville. You may select one category <br />in the first tier, three categories in the second tier, and five categories in the third tier. <br />TIER 1 (PLEASE SELECT ONLY 1) <br />O Additional lap swimming lanes (4 25- <br />yard lanes) <br />O Indoor turf fieldhouse (100' x 200') <br />O New outdoor pool (leisure, lap, site, <br />poolhouse) <br />O Warm -water leisure pool <br />TIER 2 (PLEASE SELECT UP TO 3) <br />O Additional group exercise studio <br />O Additional locker rooms <br />O Climbing /bouldering wall <br />O Memory Square improvements <br />O Multi- Activity Center (MAC) gym <br />expansion <br />O New aquatic exercise /lesson pool <br />O New fitness center <br />O One -court wood floor gymnasium <br />expansion <br />O Outdoor sprayground <br />O Youth — new youth activity /preschool/ <br />classroom area <br />16. Do you have any specific comments on your ratings or priorities? <br />TIER 3 (PLEASE SELECT UP TO 5) <br />O Expanded running track <br />O Expanded staff offices <br />O Family change locker rooms <br />O Seniors — arts and crafts classroom <br />O Seniors — expanded catering /teaching <br />kitchen <br />O Seniors — expanded game area <br />O Seniors — expanded multi - purpose <br />meeting rooms <br />O Seniors — health, wellness, and fitness <br />space <br />O Seniors — separate foyer, reception, <br />covered entry, restrooms <br />O Sports simulator area <br />O Sustainability improvements to new and <br />existing facilities <br />O Youth — expand child sitting <br />O Youth — indoor playground area <br />O Youth — new game room /teen center <br />Financial Considerations <br />The City of Louisville receives taxes, grants and development impact fees to build parks, recreation facilities, and trails. Additional funds are <br />required for the construction and maintenance of new facilities. User fees, grants, and donations offset some costs. <br />17. Understanding that facility improvements and renovations would require additional funding and that more detailed financial information <br />will be developed before decisions are made, which of the following best describes your funding preference? <br />NOTE: THESE CHOICES WILL REQUIRE REFINEMENT. THEY WILL BE DISCUSSED ON 1/27/15. <br />O I would likely support extending the existing city tax for recreation improvements, recognizing that this source of funding would provide for a <br />limited set of improvements <br />O I would likely support implementing a new city tax for recreation improvements, recognizing that this source of funding would provide for <br />O I would likely support BOTH extending the existing tax and implementing a new city tax for recreation improvements to provide for <br />OR <br />LO I would likely not support additional taxes for recreation improvements <br />18. Do you have any specific comments on your funding preferences? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.