My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 02 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2016 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 02 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:10 AM
Creation date
2/12/2016 1:09:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2016 02 11
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 14, 2016 <br />Page 12 of 14 <br />use category ten years ago. You see this throughout the LMC. The first column, the planned <br />community zone district, is Chapter 17.72. In Chapter 17.72, there are 23 allowed land uses. In <br />Chapter 17.12, we have 62 allowed land use categories. Chapter 17.12 is City wide. The <br />planned community zone districts are only the PCZD zone districts. This table can be upgraded <br />over time to mix in the Mixed Use Zone District, the planned community zone district, and office <br />zone district. What you are seeing is evidence of the incremental change over time as new <br />business or land uses are discovered. We put them in incrementally. You are bringing up an <br />obvious point from a Planning staff perspective. We know it is frustrating to applicants and it is <br />equally frustrating to staff. Do we need to do a wholesale update to Chapter 17 itself? I would <br />support that as you get through the Small Area Plans. PC has done the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Small Area Plans and Neighborhood Plans cover every different aspect of the City. You <br />have Staff that supports it. <br />Tengler asks what is the distinction of a commercial gymnasium and when does a fitness or an <br />athletic club turn into a commercial gym? What are they? <br />Russ says we don't allow commercial gymnasiums in the City of Louisville. We don't know what <br />they are. They are not defined in the LMC. We don't have a definition in Chapter 17. Staff then <br />goes to the common interpretation of it in the Webster's or Oxford dictionary and interpret it. <br />Generally, commercial gymnasiums are large commercial facilities. They are similar to health <br />clubs. Multiple sporting events go on within them that are commercial - related. They are slightly <br />different than a health spa. A health spa introduces sales, massage, and other types of <br />businesses. Commercial gym is a really antiquated use. You are seeing evidence of an old land <br />use that was common in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s that is no longer common now. <br />Tengler says if an ice rink proposal came up, how would it be handled? Would it be considered <br />a commercial gym or would it fall under one of these other health or athletic clubs? <br />Russ says I would go through all 62 of the Use Groups. If a specific land use is not identified, it <br />is not allowed. The Use Groups in Chapter 17.12 are very general and leave room for <br />interpretation and some flexibility as new businesses come on time. A publicly- operated ice rink <br />is very different than a private operation. Is it a City municipal service? We have a land use <br />code called Municipal Services and that is where the Downtown Ice Rink falls. <br />Hsu asks about Use Group 16 of private recreational and social facilities such as tennis clubs, <br />swimming clubs, and golf courses. How is that different than what you are proposing? Why <br />haven't gyms been used in this one instead of vocational schools? <br />Russ says I don't think a fitness studio is a recreational item because of the way their business <br />plan works. They are based on instruction. In a yoga studio, you have an instructor with classes <br />that sign up. In a tennis club, you don't. You can interpret it all sorts of ways. I don't think we <br />have a Use Group that clearly defines or accurately reflects a yoga studio, a Crossfit studio, or a <br />climbing gym, which is a very specific single user group. These are nuances on why we kept it <br />in a school because their business plan is school- based, not free use - based. <br />O'Connell asks if we have a definition of spa. <br />Russ says he does not have the LMC in front of me. I suspect we do not. <br />O'Connell asks if we have a definition of massage parlor. Can a massage parlor apply under a <br />spa? <br />Russ says we do have a definition of massage parlor and we heavily regulate them. That <br />specific business model requires licensure to be a massage therapist. If within your business <br />plan, you call for massage, we have codes that specifically call it out. This is different than a <br />spa. A business comes to the Finance Department and applies for a business license and use <br />and licensure are entered. The Finance Department gives it to the Planning Department to <br />determine concurrence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.