My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 01 26 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 01 26 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
2/17/2016 8:38:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 01 26 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Retreat <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 26, 2016 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />Council felt staff could do a better job of providing more information. Council expressed <br />concem they were not communicating thoroughly and staff was not clarifying the <br />direction. It was suggested staff provide a recap of Council's direction to insure they <br />understand their direction. It was also suggested Council have more items discussed in <br />study sessions. <br />After all the voting was complete and Council comments were made, Facilitator <br />Bergman asked if Council was surprised by the results. Some Council members <br />expressed surprise and some were not surprised at all by the wide - spread response. <br />Other comments related to the clarity when giving staff direction. <br />SUMMARY: City Manager Fleming summarized the findings from the exercise. Staff <br />should: <br />1. Recap after each item to ensure Council direction is clear <br />2. More clearly outline options and the implications of options so Council can set <br />priorities <br />3. Better anticipate Council's need for more information to address constituent <br />questions <br />4. Communication is an important aspect of follow through; communicate more so <br />everyone can better understand how they may be affected by items of <br />importance <br />5. Work as a team; make sure Council understands resources required (time, staff, <br />funding) for effective follow through; Council expects staff to tell them when they <br />are "getting into the weeds" of management rather than focusing on policy. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Dan Mellish, 590 W. Willow Court, Louisville, CO, (Historical Commission member), <br />addressed the current effort to erect a new building and refurbish the existing buildings <br />on the Historical Museum campus. A new structure would address several needs <br />including adequate storage for the City's historic collections of photos and artifacts. He <br />noted the downtown business owners are supportive and feel it would enhance the <br />downtown business area. He stated a $227,000 line item was allocated in the 2017 CIP <br />budget for the new building's design and repurposing of the four existing structures was <br />reduced to $20,000 to develop a marketing plan for the project. He asked if the <br />priorities are met, and there is funding available, Council reconsider reinstating the <br />funding for the building design in the CIP Budget. <br />BRIEF REVIEW OF ADOPTED 2016 PROGRAMS, GOALS, SUB - PROGRAMS AND <br />CONTRIBUTING PROJECTS <br />City Manager Fleming explained that last year Council spent significant time early in the <br />year reviewing and finalizing the Programs, Goals and Sub - Programs and during the <br />budget process reviewing the Contributing Projects for 2016. Council's review of the <br />2017 -2018 Contributing Projects will happen after tonight's meeting during which <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.