My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 01 26 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 01 26 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
2/17/2016 8:38:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 01 26 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Retreat <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 26, 2016 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />Michael Menaker, 1816 W. Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO addressed the Louisville <br />golf course and noted marketing is everything because the golf course is not self - <br />supporting. He also addressed the Downtown Neighborhood Plan and noted there <br />have been about 33 scrapes in Downtown the last five years and both the sellers and <br />buyers are happy with their decisions. He noted Council already voted not to do a small <br />area plan for Old Town. He addressed public participation and stated the public <br />comment period for this meeting was already late and some public members don't have <br />the time to wait for their opportunity to speak. With respect to the museum, he felt it <br />should be discussed under the umbrella of the Historic Preservation Plan. He stressed <br />the importance of approving the two current small area plans. He stated there is not a <br />strategic plan for Economic Development and there is a desperate need for a daytime <br />parking solution for downtown. He felt Sam's Club provides an opportunity for <br />redevelopment. <br />2016 WORKPLAN: PRIORITIZING WORK ITEMS <br />HOW MUCH TIME TO SPEND ON & SCHEDULE FOR PRIORITY WORKPLAN <br />PROPOSED COUNCIL WORK PRIORITIES IN 2016 <br />Facilitator Bergmann outlined the City Manager's proposed Work Plan and work <br />priorities for 2016. She asked Council to review the list and discuss the order of priority <br />and add other items to the list if they desired. The City Council reviewed and discussed <br />the project list and summarized why they felt each issue was important. Council <br />members then identified Council time in 2016 and assigned a City Council Regular <br />Meeting (RM) or Study Session (SS) for a Council discussion and action. <br />Council members voted by dot placement on the list of priorities for 2016 and <br />established the time allocation on each priority work item for Regular Meetings (RM), <br />Study Sessions (SS) and Executive Session (ES). Note: Assuming two Study <br />Sessions per month and two regular meetings per month, and assuming two hours per <br />study session and three hours per regular meeting, there are 66 hours of regular <br />meeting time and 44 hours of study session time, plus an additional 8 hours for longer <br />meetings. This figure does not include any of the significant time council members <br />spend outside of regular council meetings and study sessions. The city council work <br />plan: issues, priorities, time allotment and schedule are as follows: <br />2016 CITY COUNCIL WORK PLAN: ISSUES, PRIORITIES, TIME ALLOTMENT AND <br />SCHEDULE <br />ISSUE <br />1. Street Maintenance & Repair <br />2. McCaslin Urban Renewal Plan <br />3. Recreation /Senior /Aquatic Center Expansion <br />4. Golf course financial /operation results <br />5. Biennial Budget Process & Program Budget <br />RM SS MONTH <br />2 2 Mar - May /ES <br />6 0 Apr- May /Jul? <br />4 2 Feb-Jul 1 <br />0 0 <br />16 8 Ongoing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).