Laserfiche WebLink
Local Licensing Authority <br />Minutes <br />January 25, 2016 <br />Page3of5 <br />suspension imposed, with 7 days held in abeyance with conditions. The <br />conditions would be no new violations for one year, all current and new <br />employees within 60 days receive responsible vendor training. Signs are to be <br />posted at the establishment during the service of the suspension. The licensee <br />will be filing a fine in lieu of suspension petition to be brought before the Authority <br />at the next meeting. <br />Mr. Stoneman noted the terms were agreed upon and his client plans to petition <br />to pay a fine in lieu. His client assures he will implement stricter controls to avoid <br />any violations in the future. Mr. Stoneman has put Mr. Karp in touch with an <br />attorney who is very familiar with liquor licensing who has agreed to do on -site <br />training to help the staff be better prepared should situations arise in the future. <br />Lipton asked if Waterloo staff attended the training provided by the Louisville <br />Police Department. Mr. Karp noted his staff has been attending those trainings <br />on a consistent basis over the years he has been in business. <br />MOTION: Lipton moved the Authority accept the stipulation and findings and <br />order. Carlson seconded. <br />Chairperson Machado commented, the reason a show cause was ordered was <br />from the police reports, there was a visibly intoxicated person on the patio and <br />that person was served alcohol. He noted Waterloo does a good job, and he <br />was appreciative, but felt this could not be overlooked. Lipton noted other <br />citizens saw the incident. <br />Attorney Stoneman stated one police report stated a police officer did not notice <br />signs of intoxication of the party. He wanted it recognized how tough the call can <br />be in these situations. <br />Lipton questioned the 14 day suspension and whether it followed the guidelines. <br />Attorney Brown said she had considered the guidelines and noted there was a <br />State Enforcement action within the last year which she took into account when <br />suggesting imposing a 14 day suspension with 7 days held in abeyance. She <br />reported the maximum suggested for more than one violation in 1 -2 years was 21 <br />days, so she thought 14 days was appropriate, serving seven. <br />Lipton thanked the special prosecutor and stood by her previous motion. <br />Machado called for a roll call vote on the motion to accept the stipulation and <br />findings and order. Roll call vote: Machado — yes, Carlson — yes, Tennessen — <br />yes, Lipton — yes and Hervey — yes. <br />C. 2015 Annual Report <br />Lipton commented it was a wonderful report. Carlson moved to approve the <br />Annual Report and forward it to City Council and the City Manager's office. <br />Lipton seconded. All in favor. <br />