Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 02 17

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes December 16, 2015 Page 2 of 5 iii. Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Planner 11 Meseck reviewed the procedures for the meeting; opened the public hearing; and stated there are six criteria which must be met for the board to approve a variance request. Stuart then stated copies of the criteria are located on the table next to entryway. He asked for verification of proper public notice. Robinson verified the application to be heard this evening is complete, and was mailed to surrounding property owners on November 30, 2015, published in the Boulder Daily Camera on November 29, 2015, and the property was posted on posted on November 30, 2015. Malmquist moved and Stuart seconded a motion that all requirements have been satisfied and the application submitted by the applicants has been properly filed. Motion passed by unanimous voice vote. Meseck asked if anyone at the hearing had any objections to the hearing procedures he had described and asked if there were any other preliminary matters that needed to be taken care of. None were heard. Meseck asked for disclosures from the board members for any site visits, ex parte communications, and any conflicts of interest or required disclosures on the application. All Board members indicated they did not have any ex parte communications or any conflicts of interest for the application. Meseck stated that for the requested variance to be approved, four (4) of the five (5) votes would need to be affirmative. Meseck asked the applicants if they were ready to proceed with the hearing. The applicants indicated they were ready to proceed with the hearing. Staff Presentation of Facts and Issues: Robinson summarized the request for a lot area and lot width variance request for 105 Roosevelt Avenue: . Background: a. We have seen this request before. The variance was approved but has since expired. b. Existing property is 15,000 SF and zoned Residential Low (RL) density. c. RL zone district requires 70 foot lot width and 7,000 SF of lot area. d. The minor subdivision would create two lots: Lot 1 would be 57.5 feet wide and 8,625 SF in lot area; Lot 2 would be 42.5 feet wide and 6,375 SF in lot area. e. The minor subdivision would create lots that are more compatible with other properties located in Old Town. . All criteria have been met. . Therefore Staff recommends approval of this request Questions from Board to Staff. Stuart asked if the 5,250 SF would allow on multiple structures. Robinson said no, that is what is allowed on the property as now.