City Council Minutes 1993 10 19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

requirements with the exception of the two side yard set-back to Spruce Street. It is very close to RE standard. Howard indicated that, if the neighbors want who want this to be RE, I'm not adverse to voting for it to be RE; however, I would not vote, unless it met all the requirements of RE zoning. I don't want to start making exceptions. Mayer favored the RR zoning, because if the PUD does come in the RR jus. t sets the minimum standards for zoning, there is nothing that stops Mr. Leach and Mr. Beacon coming forth with a joint PUD that could receive Council approval and get higher zoning. The City is in the position that, if we did RE zoning that becomes what's allowed on the use by right and takes away some of the options in teI~s of viewing the overall PUD. I think it makes sense to approve the RR zoning and would consider a PUD and in the City's interest and met the requirements of the neighbors, would give it strong consideration. The initial RR zoning is appropriate to protect the City's interest. Howard asked Paul Wood, if it would be possible to annex this property, RE, contingent upon the completion of the joint project going through. Wood replied that the annexation agreement could reflect that. Howard asked, if the annexation agreement say that it is RE unless the following conditions are not met and noting those conditions acceptable to the Council, otherwise it will revert to RR. Woods referred to Griffiths on this question. Grlffith was a little confused as the zoning is currently RR. Howard replied that the Council recommended RR, the applicant requested RE. What I'm hearing now is that the neighbors would not mind RE. Griffiths indicated that there were two options; one, is to go ahead and zone an RR and act on the annexation tonight and then consider the different requirements at the time the PUD comes foI~ard; or, two, you could have an annexation agreement that ad~.resses the zoning matters, but you would have to have it signed by the applicant and he has to agree to it and signed prior to the action on the annexation ordinance, so you should delay this tonight until that was done. Howard then asked the applicant, if he would be willing to come in as RR and addressing the issue of RE after PUD comes in. Applicant replies "Yes, they were willing to go ahead with the RR zoning and present you with the PUD that we think makes sense to both the City and the neighbors." Lathrop moved that they adopt Ordinance 1122, Series 1993 on second an~. final reading. Seconded by Howard. Roll Call Vote. Yes: He~.ding, Mayer, Lathrop, Howard, Hornbostel and Davidson, 5/0, passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1123, SERIES 1993 - ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY - BE~.~ON - 2ND READING - PUBLIC HEARING (PUBL. LSVL. TIMES 9-8-93) 4