My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historical Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 03 02
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORICAL MUSEUM ADVISORY BOARD (pka HISTORICAL COMMISSION)
>
2006-2019 Historical Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Historical Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historical Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 03 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:15:08 PM
Creation date
3/8/2016 10:56:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HCPKT 2016 03 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ILZ ityor <br />Louisville <br />COLORADO • SINCE 1878 <br />Memorandum <br />To: Historical Commission <br />From: Bridget Bacon, Museum Coordinator <br />Date: February 23, 2016 <br />Re: Revisiting Collections Management Policy adopted Jan. 2, 2016 to request <br />a revision of the provision on permissible methods of disposal <br />At the Jan. 6, 2016 meeting of the Historical Commission, I presented a Collections <br />Management Policy for approval. I modeled the draft on approved collection <br />management policies of other museums, including the collections management policy <br />that was adopted by the Golden City Council for the Golden History Museums. <br />The section stating the deaccessioning policy, which covers the situations under which <br />items may be permanently removed from the collection, laid out permissible methods of <br />disposal of deaccessioned items. At the Jan. 6 meeting, the Commission approved the <br />draft of the policy except for making the following additional revision. Under "Methods of <br />Disposal," instead of the policy stating: <br />"Items may be returned to the donor or donor's heirs if the item was a gift and if the <br />donor's identity is known," <br />the Commission felt that the policy should instead state: <br />"Items should first be offered to the donor or donor's heirs if the item was a gift and if the <br />donor's identity is known." <br />Because of wanting to fully understand the ethical and legal issues involved, I researched <br />this aspect of the policy following the January meeting and found that there is some <br />consensus among museum professionals that there should generally not be a provision in a <br />Collections Management Policy stating that a museum should first offer a deaccessioned <br />item back to the donor or the donor's heirs. According to some, it is a well- intentioned idea <br />that could have unforeseen consequences. Some of the reasons for revising this provision <br />in our Museum's policy are: <br />• It would put the Museum in a difficult position if there is more than one heir that <br />would like to have the item, or if the donor and /or heirs are difficult to identify and <br />reach. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.