My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 02 01
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 02 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:38 PM
Creation date
3/8/2016 11:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2016 02 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Business Retention & Development Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 4, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Commissioner Menaker said the BRaD sponsored roundtable information never moved <br />forward. We need to extend what was learned from the Committee's outreach. <br />Commissioner Angell said we learn a lot from retention visits and can bring that <br />information back to Council. Retention visits are very beneficial. Chair Loo agrees. <br />Commissioner Lathrop agrees with Shelley. Businesses tout their issues more than <br />their successes. We should take that information to Council. We should be able to <br />identify needs we can advocate for. We missed an opportunity to push for County Road <br />bridge to be rebuilt more quickly. The additional CTC connector would benefit <br />downtown. Sees opportunity there. <br />Commissioner Pritchard said retention visits and one on one connection is necessary. <br />He supports the Small Area Plan (SAP). Agrees that we have missed opportunity on <br />roundtable information. Wants more effort put in McCaslin area rather than the Phillips <br />66 Property. <br />Fleming gave update on Small Area Plan development — survey work completed, South <br />Boulder Rd has three alternatives — will go to Planning Commission, choose preferred <br />alternative, then go to Council for consideration. <br />McCaslin Small Area Plan — Planning Staff held an open house and they are packaging <br />information. Will present 3 alternatives to Planning and recommendation, and then go <br />to Council. <br />The representatives on the BRaD Committee are in positions that make advocating for <br />issues difficult to City Council. <br />Council member Maloney feels the resolution is very passive. Maybe we need to <br />change the tenor of the resolution from passive to active. <br />Commissioner Lathrop said the composition of group with Council members on board is <br />good. Where we lacked is retention visits. He said DeJong can compile feedback — he <br />does not have to attend each one. Commissioner Angell said businesses really <br />appreciate the visit. <br />Chair Loo said Council knows the issues. Council does not hear from the business <br />community. Some businesses are reluctant to speak about the issues for fear of hurting <br />their businesses. <br />Commissioner Pritchard said the Council members who do retention visits need to <br />communicate information from retention visits to Council. <br />Council member Maloney said the Resolution says BRaD shall serve in advisory <br />capacity. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.