My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 03 08
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 03 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
3/16/2016 11:15:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 03 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 8, 2016: <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />Question 6 — "overall performance of the Louisville Building Safety Division" — split into <br />two questions, one for the permitting process and one for the inspection process. <br />Question 7 - "Maintenance of parks (maintenance, management, playgrounds, picnic <br />areas, etc.)" Replace maintenance and management in the parenthesis, with turf grass, <br />landscape <br />Add a line about maintenance of medians and street landscaping. <br />Question 8 — If space is available, add questions about Museum campus and programs <br />Question 14 — Consider language to clarify the Historic Preservation tax is existing sales <br />tax and not a new tax <br />Mayor Muckle called for public comment. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO described the trash, <br />recycling and composting activities from his household and addressed question 13. He <br />noted during the summer months, two weeks of composting could get very smelly. If <br />the idea was to incentivize composting, that would be different than extending the trash <br />pickup to every two weeks. There is no mention of cost. <br />John Leary, 1116 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO asked that the survey the council <br />members were working from be made available to the public since there had been <br />revisions since the packet. He addressed question 15. He expressed concern over the <br />use of the term "mixed use ". Mixed use describes commercial on the first floor with high <br />density residential on the upper floors. Mixed use in Louisville became commercial next <br />to residential. Future development would actually be high density housing and should <br />be called such. <br />Sherry Sommer, 910 S. Palisade Court, Louisville, CO asked how the feedback was <br />being used; how are the dots connected to prompt improvement. She agreed with Mr. <br />Menaker on the trash and the cost. She felt the question was confusing because it <br />addressed more than one thing. She wondered if the South Boulder Road infrastructure <br />improvements were included in the priorities for City funding. She agreed with Mr. <br />Leary's comments on mixed use. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council continued with the discussion of the survey and added instructions for the <br />following questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.