Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />April 1, 2003 <br />Page 12 of 22 <br /> <br />Brown asked Staff to look at the documents submitted and if changes are necessary, those <br />changes be presented to the Council for their review. <br /> <br />Keany stated if an application comes forward that the Staff does not support, it can still <br />move forward to the Planning Commission, and if the Planning Commission denies the <br />application, the City Council can then make a policy decision. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Planning Director Wood, if StorageTek wanted to make an application on <br />their entire parcel, would they have to request the City annex the 80-acres. Wood <br />confirmed they would have to annex if they wanted entitlements from the City. <br /> <br />There was considerable Council discussion relative to the South Sub-Area Plan: Sisk <br />stated that Staff did not need Council direction to accept development proposal. Levihn <br />stated that in fairness to StorageTek, the City must set some specifics so they will have <br />some direction. Brown suggested Council move away from the South Sub-Area <br />Committee and follow the City's procedures and processes. <br /> <br />Keany asked if the South Sub-Area Committee is still meeting. Wood stated no future <br />meetings have been set. <br /> <br />Sisk suggested the South Sub-Area Committee could still be a participant, but not make <br />any policy decisions. He was not in favor of disbanding the group. <br /> <br />With respect to the South Sub-Area, there was Council consensus the City procedures <br />and processes should be followed. <br /> <br />LOUISVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY POLL <br /> <br />Assistant City Manager for Governmental Relations Heather Balser reported on a <br />Council study session, where there was discussion concerning a survey to determine <br />community support for a November ballot question to construct a new library. She stated <br />Staff has made initial contacts with National Research Center (NRC) to complete such a <br />survey. The survey would be given to 400 residents by telephone. Depending on the <br />length of the survey (10-15 minutes) it would cost $13,776 or $15,618. The survey <br />questions will be made available to the City Council and the Library Board of Trustees <br />for comment prior to the start of the survey. She noted the NRC has done similar polls <br />for a number of other municipalities. <br /> <br />Simmons stated that the questions would be reviewed at a future work session. He noted <br />some of the same numbers used in the last election will be used, such as the mil levy, the <br />bond issue and land acquisition. <br /> <br />Sisk called for public comments. There were none. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />