Laserfiche WebLink
PRf~IDING FOR THE PAYMENT AND DISCHARGE OF THE OUTSTANDING SALES <br />TAX REVENUEBONDS BEING REFUNDED; AND PROVIDING OTHER COVENANTS AND <br />DE]~ILS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH - 2ND READING - PUBLIC HEARING <br />(~mL. LSVL. TI~ES ~1/6/93) <br /> <br />Griffiths read by title only Ordinance No. 1130, Series 1993, "An <br />ordinance of the City of Louisville authorizing the issuance of the <br />City of Louisville, Colorado, sales tax refunding revenue bonds, <br />Series 1993, in the total aggregate principal amount of $6,115,000, <br />for the purpose of refunding a portion of the city's outstanding <br />sales tax revenue bonds; prescribing the form of said bonds; <br />providing for the payment of the principal of and interest on said <br />bonds from a portion of the revenues of the sales tax imposed by <br />the city and pledged to the city's Capital Improvement Fund; <br />providing for the payment and discharge of the outstanding sales <br />tax revenue bonds being refunded; and providing other covenants and <br />details in connection therewith." <br /> <br />Forest Cason, Vice President of Kirkpatrick Petis, 1700 Lincoln <br />Street, Denver, Colorado, stated they were able to receive <br />insurance that meets all of the requirements to protect the City of <br />Louisville. They marketed the bonds as insured bonds with present <br />value savings of approximately $700,000, which amounts to a debt <br />se~wice savings of approximately $1 million in relation to the <br />prior bond issue. The interest rate on this bond issue was 15 - 20 <br />basis points lower than comparable bond issues on a national basis. <br /> <br />Maria Prevedel, Sherman & Howard (Bond Counselors for the City of <br />Louisville), 633 - 17th Street, Denver, Colorado, was there to <br />answer any questions. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />Sherman & Howard is also acting as <br />Special Counsel to the City, in <br />addition to being the bond <br />counselors. With respect to the <br />future amendments to the sales tax <br />ordinance, in terms of changes, does <br />it only limit changes that would <br />adversely effect the amount of <br />revenue the city would be collecting <br />under the sales tax ordinance? <br /> <br />Prevedel: <br /> <br />You may not amend, modify, or repeal <br />the sales tax ordinance in any way <br />that adversely effects the amount of <br />sales tax revenues, which would <br />otherwise be collected. Nothing <br />prevents you from amending the sales <br />tax ordinance to comply with the <br />State law that changes in <br />administration, enforcement, or <br />collection of the sales tax. <br /> <br /> <br />