Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT A <br />Corrierst~ine I~~Ianageriierit iias proposed a farts 1~~ unit apartment type <br />4'.omplex adjacetit. to L~illc=ii k4aC1 1I1 the L:~I1~n2iial} ~up~'r1Gr ~~it ar G'a 4f <br />Louisville. <br />The impact of tills project is significant in the sense that it will forever alter <br />the area sure=:~undirig Lc}ttisT,~i1Ie. ~r~hen the inevitable traffic congestion, air <br />pollution, p~~.blic maintenance cost, crime, and ;;eneral destruction of rural <br />txanquility is <.onsidered, it nlaf~es sense too stucl;~r carefully any such <br />schemes. <br />A visit ~ ~iurt~ra is cor~viricing evidence that growth can tae disasterous if not <br />carefully pla.nried aril controlled. <br />when yoti G'Otisider fiictt Bottli~er County real estate 1S severely depressed, <br />that record numbers of homes in Boulder County are in foreclosure, and that <br />apartment. vacancies are at high levels, what justification can be found for <br />building additioilaf housing; especially at the e:Ytraordinary unit density per <br />acre requested in this development? <br />I Hope tYie city council will vote against tY~is proposal for development or <br />allow discovery time th, publish information concerning the developers <br />previous accotilplis%imerfts in sirriilar projects and to evaluate the <br />environment~.f impact to the designated development area. <br />Public av~~~rer~ess of this project is almost non-existent and I must add that <br />persons I've spoken tc~ about it are universally against it. <br />Furthermore, should council determine that said development is worthy of <br />consideration, I believe that this issue s%o~~ld be subject t~ a referendum or <br />Vote by the people of Loulsville. <br />Thank you, <br />L. k. Redding <br />Louisville Resident <br />