Laserfiche WebLink
Bellock stated that the proposed houses are step <br />up housing and would fill a need in Louisville. <br />Mayor Fauson stated that he would recommend this <br />project to the Planning Commission, however, he <br />has a concern over the density of the residential <br />part of the plan. <br />Szymanski stated ghat the City has been in <br />negotiations regarding a golf course at another <br />site and asked Hundley if this proposal would <br />affect these negotiations. <br />Hundley stated that the basic structure of the <br />agreement could be' used in either case, but it <br />does tend to confuse the issue somewhat. Hundley <br />is proceeding on a detailed lease agreement for <br />the Davidson Mesa site and, unless instructed <br />otherwise, will continue. Hundley suggested that <br />clarification regarding site location within the <br />next month would be desirable. <br />Szymanski stated ghat the policy to refer these <br />requests to the Planning Commission does serve a <br />purpose "whether we believe in them or not." <br />Szymanski stated that he will vote to have it <br />referred but statE~d, "I don't see where there is a <br />community of interest involved here and I don't <br />feel good about this at all." <br />Mayor Fauson stated that it is his desire to <br />continue with current lease negotiations until <br />Planning Commission reviews the Coal Creek project <br />in detail. <br />Mohr stated that he is also for referring this <br />proposal to the Planning Commission and continuing <br />with the ongoing Efforts to construct a golf <br />course on the Davidson Mesa. However, Mohr wanted <br />the petitioners ors notice that there is no <br />expressed or implied acceptance of this project by <br />Council's referring the project on to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Bellock stated that he is very well aware of the <br />ongoing negotiations for a golf course on the <br />Davidson Mesa sites and that certainly the issue is <br />to provide the beat golf course to the City and <br />ask that the fina]_ agreement not be site specific, <br />but could be applied to either location. <br />Szymanski stated i~hat the golf course is not the <br />major issue with i~his proposal. The major issue <br />is the residential factor. "The golf course is a <br />5 <br />