My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1987 04 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1987 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1987 04 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:27 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 9:03:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/7/1987
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1987 04 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
between mid-April and mid-May and would take 3-4 <br />weeks for actual installation. <br />Phare explained that CL 50, D.I.P was being used <br />because it withstood pressure better than PVC pipe, <br />Phare also explained that an 8" line was proposed <br />as opposed to a 12" line stating that in order to <br />recover any costs of the 12" line, there would <br />have to be someone. willing to pay up front their <br />portion of the line that would be used for future <br />development. No one is usually willing to pay <br />this money up front since recovery from develop- <br />ment would be far into the future. A savings of <br />30~-50~ of installing the 8" line versus the 12" <br />line will be realized. <br />Szymanski expressed concern over having the <br />funding for this project coming from the CIP fund. <br />Szymanski contends that this should be funded from <br />the Water Budget. <br />Phare stated that the funding could come from <br />either fund. Usually anything funded out of the <br />Water Utility Budget is recovered by paying <br />customers. In this instance, the Cemetery is not <br />a paying customer. <br />Szymanski contended that the water used to water <br />parks is funded out of the Water Fund as it is the <br />cost of doing business - a quality of life issue - <br />everyone wants beautiful green parks and everyone <br />pays for it. Therefore, the cemetery would be the <br />same type of situation and the funding for this <br />project should come from the Water Fund. <br />Phare stated that i~he easements are coming and <br />other options are :being pursued so as not to delay <br />the project should any one easement not come <br />through. It will take approximately a month to <br />get this project i~a operation once easements have <br />been acquired. <br />Hundley stated than the easement issue will be <br />discussed at the second Executive Session by <br />Council tonight. <br />Mayor Fauson moved that Council authorize the <br />purchase of materials to construct the Empire <br />Road/Cemetery waterline project from Dana Kepner <br />in the amount of $38,284.25. Anderson seconded. <br />Szymanski offered .an amendment to the motion to <br />have the cost charged to the City's Water Fund as <br />opposed to the CIP Budget. Motion died for lack <br />of a second. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.