City Council Minutes 1987 07 21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

that site off which does make it a better site. However, he specul<~ted as to how the negotiations might have gone if the true boundaries had been known during initi<~1 negotiation. Mohr moved that Council authorize an amendment to the existing purchase option for the Treated Water Storage Tank Site t:o reflect the revised location of the acreage to be purchased by the City and reflect the appropriate change in the purchase price for fill material used from the Mesa Sand and Gravel Site for construction purposes. Anderson seconded. Unanimous. UPDATE - DRAINAGE WAY A DRAFT REPORT Phare stated that the Public Works Department recently received t:he Drainage Way A Draft Report covering revisions to the Master Drainage Plan and identification of Regional Detention Facilities. At this time, the plan. is being reviewed by staff and concerned developers regarding their potential involvement and impact on proposed improvements. It is anticipated that the City will be meeting with the developers later in the week to discuss the draft report and identify any corrections, errors or conflicts. Once a1:1 input is received, the Public Works Department will be meeting with WRC Consul- tants to discuss an:y proposed revisions. It is anticipated that the' report will be brought to a Council Study Session the first part of August. AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR STATE GRANT FOR DUI PROGRAM Council first discussed the DUI LEAF Grant at their Study Session on July 16, 1987. The application is to the Colorado Division of Highway Safety wherein the City would contribute $11,559 and the grant would be for $49,21E3. The purpose of the program is to train all officers involved in the program to be proactive DUI patro]_ officers and increase the enforcement perception of all drivers by the presence of a polices officer during peak DUI times. A complete proposal was submitted to Council at the July 16th Work Session. Sackett asked if the:~re are any quotas/standards that have to be reached i.n order to receive the grant again next year, i.e., increase the number of arrests, etc. Leesm.an stated that it is a possibility. Sackett asked if having to be so aggressive in that regard would hinder business in Louisville, particularly the restaurant business. Leesman stated that someone could construe the intent of the program by becoming more aggressive than truly necessary. 6