My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1986 04 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1986 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1986 04 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:26 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 10:44:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/15/1986
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1986 04 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
$11,231 annually. However, on the capital side <br />there is balance in the Capital Improvement Fund <br />at the end of build-out of $538,000, a $1.2 <br />million balance in the Water Fund and a $507,000 <br />balance in the Sewer Fund. There is a net budget <br />benefit to the City according to the Fiscal Impact <br />Analysis. <br />There are two issuE~s that could potentially create <br />impacts that would adversely affect the City, <br />Wanush explained. The first is the increase in <br />the rate of building activity. In 1986, there is <br />a permit cap of 502 units. By allowing 70 <br />additional units toy be tacked on to this cap, the <br />City is increasing the maximum residential <br />building. At this time, this cap is nowhere near <br />the figure. However, should building begin to <br />reach the upper lin-its, there would be a need to <br />increase personnel for inspections depending on <br />the rate of inspections. The other consideration <br />is water distribution. The middle and low zones <br />would exist on this site. Low zones would present <br />no problem. However, middle zone affects are not <br />certain at this time with additional building <br />activity. A buried storage tank on Davidson Mesa <br />would eliminate any problems and is scheduled in <br />the Capital Improvements Program for 1987. <br />Therefore, it would be a question of timing. <br />Both the Council an:d the Planning Commission feel <br />that the property meets all the requirements for <br />annexation and is an overall benefit to the City. <br />The four conditions that Planning Commission <br />recommended for thEa Warembourg annexation are: 1) <br />Developer agrees to provide a letter of credit or <br />other means acceptable to the City and an up-front <br />payment of $277,968 to cover the deficit water <br />requirements for tYie project. The City would use <br />this fund to buy raw water. Each building permit <br />on the property would then be reduced by $801 as a <br />rebate for the prepayment; 2) Property should <br />develop over a 5-year period with a building <br />permit allocation of 70 units per year; 3) <br />Existing Warembourg house be charged a Service <br />Expansion Fee of $2'.25 per sq. ft. up to a maximum <br />of $5,000; and 4) A.11 existing water rights <br />including the well be dedicated to the City. <br />Dennis Drumm, Vice--President of RB Development, <br />representative for Warembourg, made a presentation <br />to Council explaining that they have submitted a <br />request that a final decision on annexation and <br />zoning not be made this evening so that concurrent <br />to annexation and zoning a subdivision plan and <br />PUD plan could be developed. This would allow <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.