My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1986 09 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1986 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1986 09 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:26 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 11:50:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/2/1986
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1986 09 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would be coming in for a project this size and <br />then a minimum of 30 days, often 60 days, before <br />bids are awarded. <br />Szymanski stated that he felt somewhat uneasy with <br />bids going out before the City has obtained final <br />State approval as the State seems to be moving <br />slowly and it could still take several weeks. <br />Mohr expressed the same concern. <br />Phare agreed but felt that winter weather was fast <br />approaching and the City needed to get this <br />project going so the plant would be up and <br />operable as soon as possible. Phare suggested <br />that during the bid process the City can postpone <br />the date on which bids are accepted, but begin the <br />bid process and if the site application is not in <br />as the deadline approached, then postpone the bid <br />date another 3 weeks. Phare explained that the <br />desire to begin the bid process as quickly as <br />possible was due to "a very good market" right now <br />and the City could then "apply a little pressure" <br />to the State to get some action on the City's <br />request as we have been more than patient in this <br />situation. Also, awarding of bids would not take <br />place most likely until the first of November and <br />a construction period running as much as 12 <br />months. It is more desirable to start the plant <br />up before winter, hopefully October if the bid <br />process could begin now. This is the <br />recommendation of the engineering firm. <br />Hundley concurred with Phare and recommended that <br />Council proceed. <br />Carnival suggested the contract have a clause <br />stating that bids would not be opened or awarded <br />until site application has been approved by the <br />State. <br />Mayor Fauson moved that Council authorize staff to <br />obtain bids on the Wastewater Treatment Plant <br />Expansion Project. Sackett seconded. <br />Carnival moved that an amendment to the motion be <br />added to include language stating that bids would <br />not be awarded until site application has been <br />approved by the State. Szymanski seconded. <br />Unanimous. <br />Mayor Fauson called for a vote on the motion with <br />the amendment. The motion passed unanimously. <br />STREET CLOSURE REQUEST A street closure request for Lois Circle was <br />requested for a block party on Saturday, Sept. 6, <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.