Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 03 16

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes February 17, 2016 Page 2 of 12 stated copies of the criteria are located on the table next to entryway. He asked for verification of proper public notice. Robinson verified the application to be heard this evening is complete, and says the notice was posted in City Hall, Public Library, Louisville Recreation Center, Courts and Police Building, and mailed to surrounding property owners on February 1, 2016, published in the Boulder Daily Camera on January 31, 2016, and the property was posted on February 1, 2016. Ewy moved and DeJong seconded a motion that all requirements have been satisfied and the application submitted by the applicants has been properly file ,lotion passed by unanimous voice vote. Stuart asked if anyone at the hearing had any objections described and asked if there were any other prelimina of. None were heard. g procedures he had ers theeded to be taken Stuart asked for disclosures from the board members for any site visits, ex parte communications, and any conflicts of interest or required disclosures on the application. All Board members indicated they did not have any ex parte communications or any conflicts of interest for the application. Stuart stated that for the requested va prove' r (4) of the four (4) votes would need to be affirmative. Stuart asked the applicants if they were ready to ® oceed the hearing. The applicants indicated they wer ady to proceed with the hearing. Staff Presentation of Robinson presents. Thi . ' °quest fo requirements at 175 Lois Drive, Louisville, CO. ce from the lot coverage and rear setback Y Background o Property located on Lois Drive. It backs to the Warembourg Open Space and is in the Centennial Valley Filing 3 subdivision. o Existing property is 5,296 sf with a 1,623 sf building. It currently has 31 % lot coverage. o Zoning for property is Residential Estate (RE) density which requires 12,000 sf minimum lot size, 20% maximum lot coverage, and 20' required rear setback. o Applicant is proposing an addition to the building. Staff is reviewing three requests. • Expand rear deck. Existing deck does not comply with rear setback requirements. Y Existing deck extends 4' into the rear setback and is 16' from rear lot line. Y Applicant is requesting to expand the deck 3' further into the rear setback, which will be 7' into the rear setback and be 13' from the rear lot line.