My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 03 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 03 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:27 AM
Creation date
4/5/2016 11:23:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2016 03 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />February 8, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />What are trigger points that will lead LRC to re- review the Gateway in the <br />IGA? City Manager Fleming said we will wait until bids come back and see <br />if we need to reevaluate /value engineer or come up with more funding. <br />Balser said staff has worked very hard to get BNSF moving on this project. <br />Balser gave a quiet zone update: communities along corridor are trying to <br />be strategic to save money. Crossings close together must be completed <br />together. <br />e. State Assessor TIF Proposed Modifications <br />State looking at how they calculate for increments. <br />Looking at property within URA that changes from government ownership <br />to private ownership. Change in use will be counted as increment. <br />Changes to adjoining property that increases the value of a subject <br />property will be counted as increment. <br />As development occurs along Hwy 42 and assessments increase, the <br />increased value will go towards increment. <br />Regarding implementation of HB 15 -1348 we do not need to change <br />composition of LRC to be in compliance with the language. <br />Items for Next Meeting March 14, 2016 <br />A motion was made to reschedule the next meeting to Friday, March 18, <br />2016. The motion was approved. <br />Review RFP responses for 550 S. McCaslin <br />DELO Update <br />Possibly discuss additional funding for South Street paving? <br />Commissioner Comments: <br />Commissioner Menaker said he, DeJong and City Manager Fleming had a <br />retention visit with Boulder Creek Homes. He said the LRC should understand <br />fundamental business issues impacted by the decisions we make. Interacting <br />with local governing body drives up costs. <br />Adjourn — The meeting adjourned at 8:30 am <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.