My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 03 31
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LEGAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 03 31
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:20:38 PM
Creation date
4/5/2016 11:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LCPKT 2016 03 31
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Legal Review Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 17, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Loo and Lipton concurred. <br />DRAFT POLICY FOR 501c3 ORGANIZATIONS AFFILIATED WITH THE CITY <br />Members discussed concerns about the 501 c3s associated with the City <br />including using City money or the perception of using City funds for advocacy, <br />liability concerns as the City's liability protection does not extend to the 501s, and <br />reputational liability for the City because if something bad were to happen the <br />City would likely be tarnished even if there was no City involvement. <br />Loo asked if the 501 s really need that designation to fund raise. Muth stated the <br />City can accept funds for the 501 s and the City can give receipts to donors for <br />tax purposes. That option has been given some of the 501 s but they have <br />chosen not to go that route. Some of the 501s use their status to apply for grants <br />that are only given to such entities. The LCC in particular was formed as a 501 to <br />apply for SCFD funding. <br />In looking at the draft policy, Loo stated she wanted a complete ban on advocacy <br />from the 501s rather than just advocacy with City funds. <br />Leh noted that if liability is the only concern, the City can simply require them <br />each have insurance. <br />Light noted that what will be needed a clear scope of work for each City board <br />and how that scope of work for the members of the board differs from the 501 <br />scope of work. <br />Staff will bring back additional information at the March meeting. <br />LAWSUIT SETTLEMENTS /LITIGATION UPDATES <br />None <br />NEXT MEETING DATE AND POTENTIAL DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />The next meeting will be March 17 at 4 PM. At this time the only item scheduled <br />is the draft policy for 501c3s affiliated with the City <br />ADJOURN <br />The meeting adjourned at 5:55 PM. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.