My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 04 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 04 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
4/20/2016 9:05:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 04 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 5, 2016: <br />Page 4 of 18 <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton noted the Task force has been working hard along with the <br />consultant team. The Task Force wants to provide periodic updates to City Council <br />beginning with this presentation. <br />Parks and Recreation Director Stevens outlined the three parts of the Council <br />Communication; the review of the survey results, the programmatic element derived <br />with the help of the citizen task force and the tax implications. He introduced two <br />members of the consulting team from Sink Comb Dethlefs (SCD), Hillary Andren -Wise <br />and Chris Kastelic. He noted members of the Task Force were in attendance. <br />Chris Kastelic noted he would be presenting survey results for Council consideration. <br />Introduction - The purpose of this study was to gather statistically valid public feedback <br />on the Louisville Recreation /Senior Center and Memory Square swimming pool. This <br />survey research effort and subsequent analysis were designed to assist the City of <br />Louisville and Sink Combs Dethlefs in creating an architectural plan to renovate, <br />improve, and expand existing recreational facilities and services. <br />Methodology — 3 primary methods used to conduct survey; <br />1. Online, invitation only web survey <br />2. Online, open -link public survey <br />3. Online, open link survey emailed to the rec center's member contact list <br />Paper surveys were also available upon request. <br />List purchased for invitation sample mailing and 4000 surveys mailed out to a random <br />sample of Louisville residents in February 2016. <br />- 690 responses — 15% (up from the projected 10 %) — with about 3.7% margin of <br />error. <br />Demographic Profile = closely resembles the make -up of the City <br />- Relatively even gender split <br />- Fairly affluent (66% earn $100,000 per year) <br />Household Profile — Half of the respondents live in households with children (51 %) and <br />roughly 1/a are empty nesters (27 %) <br />Weekly Usage of Facilities <br />- Only 19% of respondents do not use the rec center at all, but there are major <br />differences in the reported use of facilities (i.e., weights /cardio vs. Senior Center) <br />- Top amenities used: weights /cardio, indoor track, lap swimming <br />Rec Center Usage Preferences — Crowding, lack of facilities, amenities, and poor <br />equipment topped the list of reasons why people aren't using the rec center. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.