Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />March 9th 2015 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />paving. The board's made a motion to oppose paving with concrete or asphalt, but to try <br />the stabilizing soil solution first, along with a more aggressive closing strategy, directing <br />people to park at the paved Harper Lake parking lot and use the underpass when <br />conditions are bad. Mr. Rasor observed that even in good conditions, people park <br />illegally at Davidson Mesa all the time. The board hoped that the new Open Space <br />Ranger could help with parking closures. <br />XI. Discussion Item: OSAB Sticker Voting for Favorite Features Commonly <br />Found on Trail Websites and Trail Applications <br />(postponed) <br />XII. Discussion Item: Possible Dates & Discussion Items for Joint Meeting with <br />Parks and Public Landscapes Advisory Boards in April. <br />Currently the new Parks board (PPLAB) wants to push a joint meeting to August. <br />They are busy working on their new bylaws, etc. <br />There are two city properties that may be designated improperly. The first is <br />Walnut Park, which is managed as an Open Space, but currently zoned as a Park. It <br />may be better zoned as Open Space. Missy observed that she has seen owls nesting <br />there and feeding in the field. <br />The second property is Lake Park, which is designated as Open Space. Some <br />citizen groups are hoping to have it change to a more park -like environment, including <br />irrigated lawns, whereas other citizens want it to retain as natural an environment as <br />possible. Re- zoning Lake Park as a Park would require a vote by citizens, according to <br />the town charter. Helen asked Ember to present the arguments from the pro -park <br />groups so the board can understand their concerns. The board planned to meet at Lake <br />Park at 6:30 before the April meeting so that the board can visit both properties before <br />discussing them at the April meeting. <br />XIII. Discussion Item: Revisions & Recommendations for the Draft Harper Lake <br />Interpretive Education Sign <br />Staff would like to create a permanent sign for the kiosk at Harper Lake. The <br />plan is to have rules & regulations, geographic, and ecological information on the front, <br />and historical information on the reverse. This is the logic behind the kiosk at Davidson <br />Mesa. Currently there is a temporary sign at Harper Lake, designed by staff with input <br />from OSAB. Ember presented a draft of the proposed historical sign. Catherine made <br />the sign, and Bridget from the Louisville Historical Museum provided the historic <br />background and revisions to historic content. <br />The board called out various comments on the sign. The historical chronology is <br />out of order. Too many words —Missy suggested a 100 -500 word limit. Focused too <br />much on the Harper Family. Too many border lines, the borders are strangely arranged <br />in general. Laura didn't like the font. Helen wanted the history to start before European <br />settlers. Laura didn't like using an outdated aerial photo as the backdrop to the mine <br />location map; she wanted a modern photo so people can orient themselves to the <br />historical mine. Missy didn't like the look of the timeline. Laura suggested it could be <br />expanded to be a geological and pre - historical timeline to make it more interesting. <br />Laura thought that the coal- specific history was probably redundant to information on <br />signs in other location. The board liked the Davidson Mesa sign (which was <br />professionally designed). Too many non - specific photos. Missy wanted to see more <br />water - themed information that ties into the theme of the Lake -to -Lake Trail, including <br />focusing on aquatic wildlife on the front. The board wants to see the sign adhere to the <br />6 <br />