Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 21, 2016 <br />Page 9 of 26 <br />The HPC may release the permit, or place a stay on the application for up to 180 days <br />from the date of application, which was December 18, 2015. A 180 day stay would <br />expire on June 15, 2016. <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff believes the proposed design with partial demolition is a preferred alternative to the <br />full demolition. The addition to the north is setback from the existing front of the house <br />and the two stories distinguishes the addition from the existing structure. The removal of <br />the asbestos siding will likely enhance the overall character of the structure. However, <br />the proposed design diminishes the architectural integrity of the structure by altering the <br />roofline, replacing windows, reworking the window openings and removing the porch <br />wall. Staff believes the design could limit the structure's ei• ibili for landmarking in the <br />future. <br />Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Comm::.. n place a s •f 30 days, <br />expiring April 20th, to allow the applicant time to consider design alter es for the <br />proposed additions with a member of the Hi Preservation Commis <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Stewart asks if this is a revised demolition reque <br />Trice says we are calling it update <br />Stewart says with this revision, wh regardin criteria such as 50% of the <br />roof and alteration of a street - facing <br />Trice says it is not quite 50 %. If you log -t the - -, it . changes to both street <br />facing fagades. <br />Stewart says our other criteria such as m. an 50% o he roof are not met, and more <br />than 50% of the w re not met. Basically, it is window and door openings in the <br />existing street -fa a9ades. <br />Chuck Thomas sa eliev <br />above. <br />Trice s <br />tion asked o <br />Applicant Presentatio <br />C. Burgess, 997 nth Str- ,. :oulder, CO <br />I am the architect for Bruce and Heather Feigelson for this property. We appreciate and <br />respect the Old Town Louisville Design Regulations. The defined setbacks, the density <br />lot coverage limits, maximum building height, and roof slope requirements have allowed <br />the district to retain a distinct character. It has a wonderful scale and walkability so it is <br />attractive to live within the area. These criteria are fundamental to the historic nature of <br />the district. We respect the existing modest bungalow at 1201 Lincoln as being part of <br />the history and continuity of the Old Town Louisville area. There are incentives to <br />increase lot coverage and /or building density in exchange for faithfully preserving the <br />street - facing facades. We have, however, chosen to reuse the house rather than <br />preserve it. Our attempt is to acknowledge the past while providing for contemporary <br />needs. Housing needs change. In the 1930s, two adults and three children lived in this <br />830 SF house. There was little to no insulation and the shed served as storage. Today, <br />we expect energy efficiency, we require additional space for activities and storage, and <br />we enjoy the sheltered exterior living spaces. I'd like to explain why we propose certain <br />changes to the existing house. Immediately noticeable is that the entry to the house is <br />uble hung windows with three panels <br />e applicant. <br />