Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL REVIEW USE <br />RESOLUTION #8 FOR <br />CITY SHOP FACILITY <br />Rautenstraus read Fesolution No. 8, Series 1985, <br />"A Resolution approving the Special Review Use for <br />the City of Lour;ville Maintenance Facility" in <br />its entirety. Mayor Meier moved that Resolution <br />No. 8, Series 1985, be passed and adopted. <br />Hundley advised Council that the Planning <br />Commission had inadvertently not been given <br />related information regarding a fire hydrant and <br />fire code regulations submitted by Fire Marshall, <br />Bill Dhieux. Staffs has since contacted Mr. Dhieux <br />and will work very closely with him to ensure <br />proper fire safety conformance. Access has been <br />determined as adequate. At which point the <br />building is completely occupied and used for <br />storage, a sprinkler system will be installed as <br />per the Fire Code. Also, landscaping will go in <br />under Phase I as t.o be more visually appealing <br />from Highway 42. <br />Hundley indicated to Council that the existing <br />water line that will serve this facility is <br />realistically not large enough for the water <br />pressure needed for the sprinkler system. An 8 <br />inch replacement line will have to be put in by <br />the City in the next couple of years using pipe in <br />stock and probably doing it "in-house." <br />Two Planning Commission members voted against the <br />resolution because of the facility being placed in <br />an open space area. Leary responded to this point <br />by stating that this parcel of land has been a <br />"government use parcel" and is where our se~aer <br />plant is and the shops are there now. "I feel the <br />site will be improved making it more compatible <br />with the setting." "It is relatively a desperate <br />need." The equipment would have to stay outside <br />all winter and have crews working on vehicles in <br />bad weather. <br />Hundley related to Council two options with <br />Hillhouse and Associates. Hillhouse has completed <br />a site plan for the entire area. This is normally <br />not included in standard architectural fees. <br />Therefore, staff and Hillhouse are working <br />to put everything, together in a cost that makes <br />sense for the total project including the overall <br />plans for the site. The alternatives are 1) go <br />with the 7~ fee, or 2) an 8~ fee based on time and <br />material with this figure as a top set. It is <br />requested of Council the ability of staff to <br />negotiate whatever is felt to be in the best <br />5 <br />