City Council Minutes 1994 03 15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Howard felt that was a reasonable position. He asked staff if they felt that the March 15, 1994, proposal was adequate to meet the Mann Theatre problem. Phare stated that their data addressed the whole property. He explained that two PUD's had been approved, both Mann Theatres and Comfort Inn, subject to execution of the Subdivision Agreement. He felt the intersection would function adequately with the original 18.2 acres developed with the square footage or less as identified in the traffic study. That does not provide for the Bellock property, the neighboring Morrison annexation parcel of approximately 10 acres. Lathrop did not see the March 15, 1994, option as viable at all. He felt the two developers should have already resolved the street issue themselves before the PUD was ever presented to Council. Mayer felt the City's punch list should not be part of the negotiations. That is between the City and Homart. Davidson asked when the City's punch list was expected to be completed. Annette Brand, City Administrator, explained that the City had sent Mr. Shonkwiler, Homart Development, a list of the ten different projects. Also, staff had been looking at the list. She stated that the City proposes to get together with Mr. Shonkwiler after he had[ completed his list and the City had completed their list. Then, the City will see what remains to be done and get projected dates for their completion. Davidson asked concerning the constrained vs. the March 15, 1994, proposal, which allows the maximum amount of traffic. Phare: Clearly, the constrained. Ho%,ard asked to hear from Don Shonkwiler about his position. Don Shonkwiler, Homart Development, 400 South McCaslin Boulevard, Lo~Lisville, Colorado, felt he had been very cooperative through this. In an August 9, 1993, letter to Annette Brand, City Administrator, he had raised several of the issues and asked that they be discussed in open forum, so resolution could be accomplished early. As far as whether they can be forced to pay fox' improvements to Dyer Road in the future as they apply for a Plat or PUD on Parcel O, with regard to Homart's Development Agreement, Homart cannot be forced to pay, because it is not part of the public improvements which are enumerated within the body of that document. He explained that they have absolutely no plans to access Dyer Road at this time. As far as a benefit to Parcel L, there may be some, such as the use of access from Parcel L to Dyer Road for Mann Theatres and Colony Square. He stated that right now