My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historical Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 05 04
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORICAL MUSEUM ADVISORY BOARD (pka HISTORICAL COMMISSION)
>
2006-2019 Historical Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Historical Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historical Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 05 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:15:08 PM
Creation date
5/17/2016 3:59:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HCPKT 2016 05 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Whether it makes sense for the Louisville Historical Museum to start to charge an <br />admission fee for visitors to access some buildings on the Museum campus after the <br />hoped -for campus changes are made, or what the admission fee would be, is a decision <br />for the City to make in the future. Up to this point, staff had envisioned continuing the <br />practice of not charging an admission fee so as to welcome and encourage as much <br />participation by the public in the Museum as possible, particularly with respect to 1) the <br />desire to strengthen downtown and 2) the recommendation by the Needs Assessment <br />consultant that the Museum encourage visitors to come to the Museum to share their <br />stories. In fact, the Interpretive Theme Statement in the Interpretive Plan draft that the <br />Commission and Foundation have reviewed was written to state: "The Louisville <br />Historical Museum brings together people to share stories about Louisville." The City <br />may decide that there are compelling reasons for our public Museum, like the Public <br />Library that is the other division in the Department of Library & Museum Services, to not <br />charge an admission fee. <br />• Similarly, no decision has been made with respect to whether the Museum should <br />charge for either school tours of the Museum or Museum outreach into local schools. At <br />this time, the Museum does not charge schools a fee for either activity because of the <br />educational mission being an important foundation of the Museum's activities. <br />• The Business Plan includes a recommendation to generate funding of about $5000 per <br />year by having a museum store, as many museums have. Reasons why this may not be <br />the best course of action for our Museum include 1) the lack of adequate space to have <br />a store that would generate significant funding (and the necessity of giving up <br />something else that is greatly needed at the Museum, such as meeting space, exhibit <br />space, or staff /volunteer work space, in order to create such an area of a minimum of <br />about 400 square feet) and 2) the possible desire to avoid the appearance of <br />competition with nearby downtown businesses selling similar items. <br />• The Business Plan envisions a much larger role for the Foundation and recommends that <br />the Foundation not only raise funds to assist with the specific capital project outlined in <br />the Museum Needs Assessment Report, which the Foundation directors have already <br />anticipated working on, but also that the Foundation would be heavily involved in <br />significant fundraising to help the City pay for ongoing Museum operational costs for <br />the foreseeable future. The Business Plan is relatively conservative with respect to the <br />levels of operational funding that would be provided by the City. Whether (and if so, to <br />what extent) the City would want to rely on a 501c3 to become heavily involved in <br />fundraising for City operational costs has not been decided. It does seem necessary for <br />the Foundation role in fundraising to become larger. How can the City ensure that <br />private citizens will want to and be able to grow the Foundation's role in fundraising as <br />well as sustain a level of increased fundraising for operations? If it can't be sustained, <br />what does that mean for the City -owned Museum's operations and the communities it <br />serves? <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.