Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2016 <br />Page 2 of 17 <br />John Leary, 1116 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO speaking as Chairman for Citizen's <br />Action Council (CAC) noted a newspaper article reported the CAC opposed the Arnold <br />development at South Boulder Road and Hwy. 42. He stated CAC has never discussed <br />the issue, has never taken a position and will not be taking a position. <br />APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA <br />Mayor Muckle called for changes to the consent agenda and hearing none, moved to <br />approve the consent agenda, seconded by Council member Stolzmann. All were in <br />favor. Council member Keany absent. <br />A. Approval of the Bills <br />B. Approval of Minutes : April 5, 2016 <br />C. Approval of Executive Session at 6:00 PM on May 3, 2016 <br />D. Approval of Dell Procurement <br />COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS ON PERTINENT ITEMS NOT ON THE <br />AGENDA <br />Council member Loo noted the Arbor Day celebration and planting will be this weekend, <br />Saturday April 23rd, at the arboretum 11AM until 2PM She reported there is a branch <br />recycle day on May 7, 2016. <br />CITY MANAGER'S REPORT <br />City Manager Fleming thanked all for their patience with the construction projects <br />throughout the City. He noted the crews are working quickly and making good <br />progress. <br />REGULAR BUSINESS <br />RESOLUTION NO. 17, SERIES 2016 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SOUTH <br />BOULDER ROAD SMALL AREA PLAN <br />Mayor Muckle called for a staff presentation <br />Planner II Robinson noted the draft South Boulder Road small area plan was presented <br />at the last City Council meeting. The changes Council requested are reflected in the <br />updated plan and addressed in the staff report included in the packet The biggest <br />change was to the Urban Design Plan which addresses the allowed uses. The <br />allowance for residential as a Special Review Use (SRU) in Commercial Community <br />(CC) and Commercial Business (CB) zone districts has been removed. One issue that <br />was unclear from Council's direction at the Apnl 5 meeting is how to treat properties <br />zoned CC and CB that already have residential development. If one of those <br />