Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2016 <br />Page 8 of 17 <br />Council member Loo asked for input from staff about any agreements with CDOT on the <br />Kaylix signal The answer was there were none, it is a local road. She asked about the <br />signal at Cannon and CDOT assistance <br />Planner Robinson noted the adopted Hwy. 42 Gateway Plan CDOT has agreed to and <br />endorsed the signal at Cannon Circle <br />Council agreed to leave out of the plan the signal at Kaylix. <br />Council member Stolzmann didn't feel CDOT would allow the, signal at Hwy 42 and <br />Cannon even though they have agreed to the plan. She thought better placement was <br />at Griffith and not so close to the intersection. <br />Planner Robinson noted any signal on a State highway has to be considered warranted <br />by CDOT. He noted there is a property owner there going through potential <br />redevelopment with the assumption the signal at Cannon will be there. <br />Council member Stolzmann understands taking the signal would not prevent the <br />redevelopment as proposed to proceed <br />Planner Robinson noted the redevelopment is counting on the signal being there. <br />There still would be the possibility the signal would not be considered warranted by <br />CDOT and never be installed. <br />Council member Loo was reluctant to take out the signal on Hwy 42; if never warranted, <br />it won't go in, but should be left on the plan. <br />Mayor Muckle did not want to change the signal on this plan. <br />Council member Maloney thought unless it was needed, leave it off. <br />Council member Stolzmann felt what was envisioned is not what is being developed. <br />She wanted it to be at a safe location. Council member Loo reiterated if it was never <br />warranted, it would not be put in <br />Council member Maloney addressed the fiscal model. He realized it is directional not <br />exact. He wondered where the assumptions come from. Using the same number for <br />percent spent on taxable income across all income levels could skew the model as <br />much as 20 %. He was cautious about the numbers and thought they were too high <br />Finance committee should look at the fiscal model. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />