Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />April 13th 2015 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />"shaggy" look of Lake Park wasn't simply a function of the reduction of City mowing that <br />the whole City has experienced as a result of the economic downturn. Mike felt Lake <br />Park Open Space should remain as Open Space, but perhaps the City could change the <br />classification to Open Space -Other to allow for more aggressive weed control, more <br />frequent mowing, and perhaps better maintenance of the shrub beds. Linda asked if the <br />City was being too influenced by the opinions the adjacent neighbors rather than the <br />whole city, and expressed concern about how increased maintenance at Lake Park <br />Open Space might tax the total Open Space budget. Helen revisited the Open Space <br />classifications' legal description and pointed out that the current Open Space- Visitor <br />designation was flexible enough to allow a bit more manicured maintenance. Laura <br />agreed with Helen that the Open Space- Visitor designation still fits and mowing could be <br />increased, but the debate may really come down to weed and algae control. Graeme <br />felt that algae is probably inevitable in a pond like this because of the high nutrient load <br />of the area but the current aeration bubblers should keep the pond from destructive <br />anoxia. <br />Helen proposed a motion: Keep Lake Park Open Space designated as Open <br />Space- Visitor. Keep the current maintenance routine of mowing, but make incremental <br />improvements such as mulching and grooming the beds and introducing some weed <br />control. Linda seconded the motion. The board voted on this motion with six votes for, <br />no votes against, and one abstention. <br />Walnut Park has been designated as a Park, but maintained as an Open Space, <br />with weed control and volunteer projects. Raptors routinely nest in the area and there <br />are plenty of reports of coyotes using the land. Previous Open Space staff even put a <br />sign on the property that refers to it as an Open Space. There haven't been any citizen <br />complaints about the way the land is maintained. Spencer made a motion: the City <br />should re- designate Walnut Park as Open Space. Linda seconded. The board passed <br />the motion unanimously. Ember will take recommendation to Joe Stevens. Ember <br />suggested that OSAB also discuss this issue with the new Parks Board (PPLAB). <br />X. Discussion Item: Trail Updates <br />a. Davidson Mesa National Trails Day Volunteer Project— Presented by Harlan <br />Vitoff, Open Space Technician <br />Harlan presented a trail project planned for Saturday, June 11, 8 -12am, at the <br />Northwest corner of the the Davidson Mesa property. National Trail Day is officially June <br />4th, but there were so many things going on in the City on that day that staff changed <br />the date of the event. Last year only one person showed up to this event, but this year <br />Harlan has a business signed up for an organized work event. More volunteers are still <br />needed, however. Harlan showed photos of the highly eroded current trail conditions <br />and shared some of its current statistics (see meeting packet). The repair goals are to <br />reduce water erosion and create water bars, so that water doesn't run down the trail and <br />further erode it. Harlan thought that logs might be the most effective materials for the <br />water bars. Harlan listed all the materials that would be needed and presented a plan <br />for deploying all the materials on the day of the event. Helen asked how many <br />volunteers would they need to move all that material with buckets. Harlan thought 20 -25 <br />people, working for four hours, would be sufficient. <br />Ember pointed out that this is an unusual project since these two trails are <br />essentially non - conforming social trails, and repairing them may be construed as <br />tantamount to endorsing them. Also, be aware that the "primary trail" has been on City <br />Open Space maps for years. The board felt there should to be a single trail, not both of <br />these trails in use. Board members initially preferred repairing the less steep <br />6 <br />