My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agenda and Packet 2016 05 25
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
RECREATION/SENIOR/AQUATIC CENTER EXPANSION TASK FORCE
>
2016 Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agendas and Packets
>
Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agenda and Packet 2016 05 25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:07:15 AM
Creation date
6/1/2016 9:01:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RSACETFPKT 2016 05 25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Task Force <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 11th, 2016 <br />Page 2of3 <br />Fair Campaign trainings will occur with the Task Force, in addition 2 are <br />scheduled: June 8 from 9 -10 am and June 13 6 -7 pm. Both are at city hall and <br />will be facilitated by Attorney Sam Light. July 18 will be the last Task Force <br />official day. <br />The expansion cost sits at about $30 million. Council originally envisioned $15 to <br />$25 million. Current prediction may be too high, and Sink Combs Dethlefs will be <br />asked to lower it closer to $27 million. An estimate per household cost was <br />given; at $25 million dollars it would be about $117 per year and about $40 per <br />year additional for O &M (based on a $500,000 house). Must also consider <br />business property owners, because the tax cost would amount to 3 times the <br />cost for them. <br />VI. Subcommittee Updates — Tom Tennessen gave the update on the <br />subcommittee that is meeting to review the Greenplay documents. They gave <br />specific questions that they had for Greenplay, and the next meeting to discuss it <br />will be May 18th at 5:00 pm at the Recreation /Senior Center. <br />VII. Feedback from May 4th Open House — Sink Combs Dethlefs <br />Open house documents will be posted as an addendum to tonight's meeting, as <br />details of the open house are listed there. SCD will work with staff to modify <br />designs based on feedback received. <br />The surface in the MAC gym was discussed and the 3 types considered are <br />rubber, wood, and turf. Each have an advantage with rubber being the cheapest, <br />and turf giving the best programmable options. It was discussed whether the <br />MAC gym should be eliminated based on the $2.8 million cost. Kaylix McClure <br />thought the youth would be able to utilize the turf for programs and activities and <br />felt the gymnasium already provided a wood floor option. There was <br />overwhelming support to keep the MAC gym. The current plans offer a little of <br />something for everyone. <br />Deborah Fahey spoke of her expectations for the expansion to have high <br />sustainability standards, and to build with future generations in mind. Councilman <br />Lipton said net zero is difficult to impossible to achieve in recreation centers, and <br />that comments at the open house were positive with what was presented in <br />regards to sustainability. <br />VIII. Refined Floor Plans and Cost Estimate - Sink Combs Dethlefs <br />Most of the overrun in current cost predictions comes from site plan <br />considerations. SCD will look to modify the parking options, with possibly moving <br />west with the parking lot addition and relocating the tennis courts on the <br />recreation center campus grounds. If courts were moved, consideration will be <br />given to restrooms and water availability. It was agreed that the cost savings <br />could occur by eliminating the new track loop and keep the current configuration. <br />Would like to get the project closer to $27 million, from the current $30 million. <br />Each Task Force member provided input on site plans and facility designs. <br />Overall the Task Force agreed the track should remain as it currently is and the <br />MAC gym with turf was supported. Rich Bradfield would like to have discussions <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.