My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016 Citizen Survey Results
PORTAL
>
CITIZEN and EMPLOYEE SURVEYS (40.340A)
>
2016 Citizen Survey Results
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 2:31:49 PM
Creation date
6/21/2016 10:41:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Doc Type
Survey Compilations
Record Series Code
40.340A
Record Series Name
Surveys Conducted by City
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Louisville Citizen Survey <br />June 2016 <br />• Most ratings for community characteristics were much higher when compared to the national and <br />Front Range benchmarks. Only ratings for the variety of housing options and availability of affordable <br />quality housing were much lower than jurisdictions elsewhere in the country and the Front Range. <br />Residents feel safe in their community. <br />• Almost all Louisville residents indicated they felt safe in and around the community during the day <br />and a similar proportion felt safe from violent crime and in the downtown area and in their <br />neighborhoods at night. At least 8 in 10 also reported they felt safe from property crimes and in <br />Louisville's parks after dark. <br />• Compared to ratings in 2012, fewer residents felt safe in Louisville's parks after dark and from <br />property crimes in 2016. Ratings for all other perceptions of safety were similar to 2012. <br />• All safety ratings were much higher those given by residents in other communities across the nation <br />and in the Front Range. <br />The performance of the City of Louisville government performance is viewed <br />favorably by residents. <br />• Three - quarters or more of participants felt that information about City Council, Planning Commission <br />and other official City meetings, overall performance of the City government, the City's website, <br />information about City plans and programs and availability of City government employees as <br />excellent or good. About two- thirds rated the City's response to citizen complaints or concerns highly. <br />• Residents who had contact with a City employee gave positive reviews to their interactions, with at <br />least 8 in 10 saying the employees' courtesy, knowledge, availability, responsiveness /promptness and <br />their overall impression of the employee were excellent or good. Compared to 2012 evaluations, only <br />the responsiveness /promptness of employees decreased in 2016, while all other ratings remained <br />similar. <br />• Almost all evaluations of employee characteristics were higher or much higher than comparisons to <br />both the nation and Front Range. Ratings for the courtesy of Louisville employees were similar to <br />other jurisdictions in the Front Range. <br />Respondents think highly of City government services. <br />• About 9 in 10 Louisville residents rated the overall quality of City services as excellent or good, which <br />was similar to ratings given in 2012 and 2008. Compared to other jurisdictions across the U.S. and <br />compared to jurisdictions in Colorado's Front Range, Louisville's quality of services rating was much <br />higher than both benchmarks. <br />• Most safety services were given favorable assessments, with the highest ratings given to 911 service, <br />the overall performance of the police department and the visibility of patrol cars. When comparisons <br />could be made, all ratings of police services were much higher than the national and Front Range <br />benchmarks. <br />• Many services provided by the Parks and Recreation Department were given high marks by most <br />respondents, including the adequacy of parks, bike paths, playing fields and playgrounds, <br />maintenance of parks, maintenance of the trail system and the overall performance of the Parks and <br />Recreation department. Current recreation programs for youth, maintenance and cleanliness of the <br />Louisville Recreation Center and maintenance of the trail system were evaluated much higher than <br />national comparisons. <br />Report of Results <br />2 <br />Prepared by National Research Center, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.