My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 06 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:12 PM
Creation date
6/30/2016 11:20:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2016 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> March 16, 2016 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> Campbell says I was not clear on who he is representing. There is often a difference of opinion. <br /> Robinson says he is representing the City of Louisville. He is not defending a position I may <br /> have as Staff. We both act on behalf of the City and in the interest of the City. <br /> Ewy says the BOA is a quasi-judicial board and it is important that he weigh in on our questions <br /> of legality. <br /> Stuart says Sam Light is the arbitrator of how we interpret these rules. If we are not interpreting <br /> them correctly, he would be the one to say you can't do it that way. You have to do it this way. It <br /> has been consistently done with his concurrence for a long time. <br /> Campbell says in some situations, the BOA has a separate attorney from the City's attorney. <br /> Robinson says that is not the way it works here. <br /> Stuart says on other boards I'm on (not the City), I have my own attorney. Not in Louisville. <br /> Meseck says if there is confusion on our City Council's role and representation, my <br /> recommendation is we take that off Board. We have tried to clarify as best we can, but this is <br /> outside the scope to me. This is also outside the specific variance presented tonight. If we need <br /> to have this discussion, let's have it outside. We don't have our own specific counsel and none <br /> of the boards do. Meseck asks if there are further questions of Staff. <br /> Stuart has no questions. DeJong has no quest' wy has no questions. Meseck has no <br /> questions. Campbell has no questions. <br /> Presentation from Applicant: <br /> Phil Larson, 2090 Stony Hill Rd, Boulder, CO <br /> I am the owner of the property at 175 Lois Drive. I could no ake it to the previous meeting. <br /> am trying to rebuild this house so that every room in this house ihierviceable. My mantra <br /> coming in here is to improve every single room in this house. It craft not need to be bigger; it <br /> just needs to be better in some way. A deck should be the most used room on the house. I am <br /> trying to provide enough deck space even with the restrictions of setback. This was a bit of a <br /> surprise in buying the house. I want the ability to have a table and four chairs. I want to enjoy <br /> the beautiful view out the back of the house. The open space is a stunning view. I come from <br /> Boulder. The view is panoramic and a treasure. I hope to have a deck built that is a few feet <br /> bigger than what was there before. The previous deck was nonconforming. This has been a <br /> double surprise from the start. I appeal to your common sense and open mindedness that <br /> perhaps this deck is value added to the City of Louisville. <br /> Questions from Board to the Applicant: <br /> Ewy has no questions. DeJong has no questions. Stuart has no questions. Meseck has no <br /> questions. <br /> Campbell asks do you intend to live in the house. You currently live in Boulder. <br /> Larson says yes. I have lived in Boulder for 19 years in the same house. My wife of 34 years <br /> and I plan to live in the house. <br /> Public Present in Favor of Application: None. <br /> Public Present in Opposition of Application: None. <br /> Staff Recommendation: <br /> Staff believes the application meets the criteria and recommends approval. <br /> DeJong has no comments. Ewy has no comments. Stuart has no comments. <br /> Campbell says I am still curious about criterion #1 and unique hardship. Can Staff review that <br /> for me? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.