Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville, Colorado • Louisville Recreation Center Tax Survey • 2016 <br /> Summary <br /> • The City of Louisville contracted with National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) to develop <br /> and administer a topical survey to measure citizen opinions about possible tax questions <br /> for the 2016 ballot related to the expansion of the Recreation and Senior Center and <br /> Aquatics Facilities. <br /> • The Louisville Recreation Center Tax Survey was administered by phone using an <br /> eligible registered voters list obtained from the County of Boulder Elections Office. <br /> • A total of 400 surveys were completed,with a response rate of 8%. <br /> • The margin of error is plus or minus five percentage points around any given percentage <br /> point for the entire sample. <br /> Residents of Louisville think highly of their City government's performance. <br /> • About 8 in 10 residents awarded high marks to Louisville's government performance, <br /> including the overall direction of the City, overall confidence in City government and <br /> City government acting in the best interest of the community. <br /> • Residents who had lived in Louisville 16 years or longer tended to give lower marks to <br /> some aspects of government performance,including the overall direction of the City, <br /> overall confidence in government and the government acting in the best interest of the <br /> community than respondents who had lived in the community a shorter time. <br /> • Residents who awarded high marks to all aspects of government performance were also <br /> more likely to report they would vote in favor of a property/sales tax combination or two <br /> property taxes to support the recreation center than those who did not view government <br /> performance as favorably. These residents with a high-regard for Louisville government <br /> were also more supportive of the extension of the historical preservation tax. <br /> A majority of voters would vote for an expansion for the Recreation Center and <br /> were influenced by the possible amenities that would be included and the <br /> expiration of the Library Bond tax. <br /> • Overall,when asked whether they would vote to increase their property taxes to finance <br /> a 25-year bond for the expansion of the Recreation and Senior Center and to improve <br /> Memory Square Pool,74% of voters said they would be willing to pay at least 5110 a year. <br /> By comparison, l5%would vote"no" to any tax increase to fund the Recreation and <br /> Senior Center and Memory Square Pool improvements,while 10%would vote"yes" to <br /> amounts between $1 and $100. Of those willing to pay at least $110 per year, 69%would <br /> pay at least $125 or and 57%would pay $150 a year. <br /> • Voter segments more likely to vote for a property tax increase to finance the 25-year <br /> bond to expand the Recreation and Senior Center included voters who had lived in <br /> Louisville 5 years or less,voters who did not have household members over the age of 65, <br /> a <br /> a <br /> 1 <br /> 15 <br />