City Council Minutes 1994 06 07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mayer accepted that. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 6 - 0 vote with Howard being absent. RESOLUTION NO. 34, SERIES 1994 - FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT AND PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ALVENUS PARK Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that this 18.6 acre parcel will be divided into eight lots for commercial/office development. A Final PUD Development Plan for proposed Lot 1 is for a 21,000 s.f. one and two story office building with a building coverage on Lot 1 at 21.2%. A total of 122 parking spaces (24 compact spaces) are proposed, which would accommodate 80% of the buildings square footage for medical/dental use. Tract A, 1.93 acres, is proposed as the 12% public land dedication. The tract will provide a trail linkage between Hwy. 42 and a previously dedicated 4.4 acre open space parcel, which includes Hecla Lake. The location along the north property line, while consistent with the Louisville Plaza General Development Plan, is now in partial conflict with Resolution No. 34, Series 1992 (SEE ATTACHED), which has four'conditions of approval. Tract A includes a 75' Public Service Company power line easement. The PSCO easement encumbers approximately 30,175 s.f., or .69 acres of Tract A. The land dedication provides sufficient area to accomplish the proposed trail linkage. On May 10, 1994, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 18, with eight conditions of approval (SEE ATTACHED). The caliper of the deciduous trees would have to be 2 1/2 inches. Davidson called for the applicants presentation. Bob Brisnehan, 836 Main Street, P.O. Box 337, Louisville, Colorado, stated that they agreed with the Planning Commission to adjust the parking depending on need. They had no problem with the 2 1/2 inch caliper tree requirement. They agreed with the traffic light contribution. He had no problem with abandoning Lake Hecla. He preferred making the lake an amenity for the City. Davidson called for Council Questions. Lathrop wondered if the City installs the traffic light and then recovers costs from the subdivider. Brisnehan stated that the traffic signal is not proposed for 20 years. The agreement states that the City installs the traffic light and recovers costs. A traffic signal built today would be $75,000 and he felt there share would be approximately 3%. They will make the contribution at this time. Lathrop wondered if the access permit had been acquired from the Hwy. Department. Brisnehan: No. The access was established in 1991. There will be more permitting required, i.e., the barricades, how we can interrupt traffic installing it, etc. Lathrop stated that Resolution No. 34, No. 1 states that an access permit from CDOT shall be required for construction of Hecla Drive. All intersection improvements at Hwy. 42 and Hecla Drive