My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historical Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 07 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORICAL MUSEUM ADVISORY BOARD (pka HISTORICAL COMMISSION)
>
2006-2019 Historical Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Historical Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historical Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 07 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:15:08 PM
Creation date
7/5/2016 9:29:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HCPKT 2016 07 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 4 of 150 <br /> Before the current planning process began,the 2004 Conservation Assessment Program (CAP) Report <br /> first identified issues and goals for the Museum.l The City has implemented many of that Report's <br /> recommendations, including the installation of a fire protection system and a security system.The <br /> Report also recommended that the City construct a "new, purpose-built facility on site" in the <br /> location between the Jacoe Store and Tomeo House in order to create a "viable collections center" <br /> with "excellent exhibit spaces and rooms for offices and programs." <br /> The process to develop this Master Plan document came out of the 2013 City Comprehensive Plan, <br /> which included the following principle: "City policies should encourage a livable community with a <br /> strong sense of history." Under this Comprehensive Plan principle was the policy that the City should <br /> adopt a "Historical Museum Campus Master Plan." <br /> Next,the City arranged to have museum experts conduct a needs assessment of the Museum <br /> activities and campus. Following a request for proposals,and with financial support from the <br /> Louisville History Foundation,the City engaged Metcalfe Architecture& Design ("Metcalfe")to <br /> conduct a needs assessment and issue a report for the Museum. Metcalfe representatives visited the <br /> site and obtained input from the public and stakeholders at public sessions,and finalized its report in <br /> December 2014.The Needs Assessment Report expanded on the CAP Report by proposing a new <br /> Visitor Center building,to be called "the Community House,"that will address many of the Museum's <br /> current limitations and will allow the Museum to provide ADA access, and more effectively preserve <br /> and exhibit the collections and serve tourists and the community. Metcalfe advised the City that the <br /> final Master Plan document should consist of its own Needs Assessment Report, plus an Interpretive <br /> Plan to be written by the Museum Coordinator and a Business Plan for the City to commission from a <br /> consultant who focuses on museum business plans. <br /> Following another request for proposals,the City engaged ArtsMarket, Inc.to prepare the Museum <br /> Business Plan.ArtsMarket visited in December 2015 and met with groups of stakeholders in a <br /> number of meetings.ArtsMarket's Business Plan is dated February 2016. <br /> The Louisville Historical Commission has been very involved in the creation and evolution of this <br /> Master Plan.The Commission has regularly discussed both the overall direction and the specifics of <br /> the Master Plan at Commission meetings since 2014, and individual Commission members were able <br /> to meet with the consultants during their site visits.The Commission reviewed and discussed a draft <br /> of the Interpretive Plan at its meeting on Sept.2,2015,and The Museum Coordinator also sought and <br /> received input for the Interpretive Plan from a Commission subcommittee that met for this purpose. <br /> Commission edits and suggestions from these meetings were incorporated into the Interpretive Plan. <br /> The Louisville History Foundation, as a private nonprofit 501c3, is not a part of the City administration <br /> and its directors do not act in an official advisory capacity to the City. However,City staff has kept the <br /> Foundation board of directors informed throughout the Master Plan process,and sought and <br /> incorporated input from its directors at key points throughout the process. <br /> i As noted in the Executive Summary, museum experts assessed the Museum and wrote the Report pursuant to a <br /> grant to the City from the Institute of Library and Museum Services. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.