My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 06 07 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 06 07 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
7/6/2016 3:33:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 06 07 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br />June 7, 2016 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />City Manager Fleming introduced the item saying staff needed direction on how to move <br />forward with possible ballot language for a recreation center expansion and whether it <br />should include a property tax increase for both the bond and operations and <br />maintenance (O &M) or a property tax for the bond and a sales tax for the O &M. He <br />recommended a 20 -year term for the bond repayment, but asked Council for their input <br />on the length of the bond repayment. <br />DISCUSSION /DIRECTION — RECREATION /SENIOR CENTER <br />AND AQUATICS TAX SURVEY RESULTS AND CITIZEN SURVEY <br />RESULTS ON MUSEUM AND PRIORITIES <br />and <br />DISCUSSION /DIRECTION — POTENTIAL REVENUE SOURCES <br />FOR AN EXPANDED AND RENOVATED RECREATION /SENIOR <br />CENTER AND AQUATICS FACILITIES <br />Laurie Urban from National Research Center presented the results and methodology of <br />the tax survey. It was a phone survey of registered voters. She stated most residents <br />rate Louisville highly. She noted in general households with children, those without older <br />adults, and those who have lived here a shorter amount of time gave the most support <br />for a possible tax measure. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked what the margin of error is for question 5. Urban <br />noted it is approximately plus or minus 7 -8 percent. Urban stated this question was <br />particularly difficult because people were asked the question in a random order to <br />determine what is the highest amount he or she would agree to pay. Those who <br />answered that they would pay the $150 from the start were not asked the lower <br />amounts. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if there was substantial support for a $150 per year cost to <br />fund the bond issue. Urban stated 77% of those asked the question (plus or minus a 7- <br />8% margin of error) would agree to pay the $150 cost. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the $150 amount appears to be the right number to look at <br />as there does appear to be support for it. Mayor Muckle and Councilmember Leh <br />agreed that $150 seems to be the right number to ask. <br />Urban noted the more people Teamed about what would be included in the expansion <br />the more likely they were willing to pay for an expansion. Also, knowing the library <br />bonds would be paid off also meant more were likely to support the expansion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.