Laserfiche WebLink
City of Louisville Citizen Survey <br /> August 2008 <br /> Public Safety <br /> A majority of survey respondents reported that the various aspects of Public Safety included on the <br /> survey were "excellent" or"good."All of the aspects of Public Safety that could be compared with <br /> national and Front Range normative data showed Louisville once again exceeding its peers. <br /> Louisville Public Safety ratings were similar to 2004,with traffic regulation enforcement being seen <br /> even more positively in 2008 than it had in 2004. Most respondents felt that the level of most <br /> aspects of traffic enforcement was "about right." <br /> Planning and Building <br /> More than half of respondents thought that Louisville's building and planning processes and the <br /> overall performance of the Building Safety Division and the Planning Department were at least <br /> "good."About one-quarter of respondents rated the Planning and Building services and <br /> departments as "fair."The only comparison that was available in this topic area was for the overall <br /> performance of the Planning Department,which showed Louisville as ranking above the national <br /> benchmark. <br /> Parks and Recreation <br /> When asked to rate various aspects of Parks and Recreation in Louisville, two-thirds or more of <br /> respondents who had an opinion gave a"good"or better rating to each of the 14 services listed on <br /> the survey.Two out of five respondents who had an opinion rated trail system maintenance and <br /> parks,paths, fields and playgrounds as "excellent."Ten of the Parks and Recreation questions could <br /> be compared to the national benchmark. Louisville was above the benchmark for all of these, except <br /> the golf course,which received a rating similar to the national benchmark.Three comparisons were , <br /> available for the Front Range:Trail maintenance, recreation center maintenance and performance. <br /> In all,Louisville compared favorably. <br /> Public Library <br /> Since the 2004 survey,a new library was built in Louisville. Nine out of 10 respondents thought <br /> highly of the facility and services the library provides,rating each as "good" or better.Louisville <br /> rated higher,in fact, than its counterparts across the nation and Front Range,where comparisons <br /> were available. Not surprisingly, all library ratings were higher than those given for the library in <br /> 2004. <br /> Public Works <br /> Two-thirds or more of respondents felt that Louisville's water, sidewalks and streets as well as the <br /> overall performance of Public Works was "good"or better. Snow removal was rated the lowest <br /> among this category of services and characteristics,but still received a"good" or better rating from <br /> 6 in 10 respondents. Of those questions that could be compared to national and Front Range <br /> benchmark data, snow removal was the only one below the national norm.It ranked above the Y <br /> Front Range benchmark,however,where lower ratings for snow removal were received in surveys u <br /> administered in other jurisdictions during the last year,probably attributable to the winter blizzard 5 <br /> that paralyzed much of the Front Range in 2007. The only Public Works ratings that had decreased <br /> since 2004 were street sweeping and snow removal. <br /> co <br /> Report of Results <br /> 3 <br />