My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 07 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 07 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
7/15/2016 8:48:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
FCPKT 2016 07 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The second type of credit is a site-specific credit for system improvements that have been included in <br /> the impact fee calculations. Policies and procedures related to site-specific credits for system <br /> improvements should be addressed in the ordinance that establishes the development fees. However, <br /> the general concept is that developers may be eligible for site-specific credits only if they provide system <br /> improvements that have been included in the impact fee calculations. Project improvements normally <br /> required as part of the development approval process are not eligible for credits against impact fees. <br /> RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES BY NUMBER OF BEDROOMS <br /> Impact fees are often assessed as a flat fee per housing unit, regardless of size or numbers of bedrooms. <br /> While legally defensible, the "one fee fits all" structure of this type of schedule can be regressive in <br /> nature as smaller homes and apartments pay disproportionately larger share of costs, while larger <br /> homes pay disproportionately smaller shares. <br /> One of the fundamental requirements of impact fees is the concept of proportionate share. <br /> Proportionate share is the principle that impact fee amounts must correspond with the demand and <br /> cost for additional infrastructure capacity. This relationship is the critical difference which distinguishes <br /> impact fees from taxes. Smaller homes and apartments often have smaller household sizes compared <br /> to larger ones. These differences have a direct relationship on the need for additional infrastructure <br /> capacity resulting in differences in impact fee amounts. Impact fees based on number of bedrooms or <br /> size of units more accurately reflect actual proportionate demand for additional infrastructure capacity. <br /> To better reflect the proportionate demand for additional infrastructure capacity created by different <br /> types of residential land uses, TischlerBise has calculated residential impact fees by types of housing <br /> units by number of bedrooms. <br /> PROPOSED IMPACT FEES <br /> The proposed impact fee amounts are listed in Figure 2A below. In order to provide a basis for <br /> comparison, the City's current impact fees are shown in Figure 2B with the dollar change between the <br /> proposed and current fees listed in Figure 2C. <br /> 7 FINAL VERSION <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.