Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 5, 2016 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />Mayor Muckle opened the public hearing and called for a staff presentation. <br />City Manager Fleming stated this ordinance is to clarify the boundary between Memory <br />Square Park and 833 Jefferson Avenue. There are discrepancies in the legal <br />description for the boundary lines for the lot. Over 20 years ago the fence was placed <br />with good faith where the parties thought the boundary line was, although the fence is <br />1.57 to 3.23 feet too far south. Further complicating matters, on the western side of the <br />property, the City vacated the alley, which typically results in the adjacent property <br />owners gaining the vacated property. However, at 833 Jefferson Avenue the fence is <br />still on the previous boundary line of the alley. To address the issues and uncertainties <br />the property owners and the City have drafted a boundary line agreement to allow the <br />fence to stay where it is as the agreed upon boundary line of the property. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for applicant comments and hearing none, asked for public <br />comments. Hearing none, he called for Council comment. <br />Mayor Muckle suggested this be approved. Council member Loo agreed. <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing. <br />City Attomey Light stated the recommendation is specific to the facts of this case. It <br />appears there was essentially a mutual mistake regarding the location of the fence <br />originally and the parties on either side of the fence relied on the fence as the boundary <br />line. The agreement also resolves the issue on the west side where the fence does not <br />align with the alley vacation description when the alley was vacated in the early 1980's. <br />The boundary line agreement is a mutual resolution to these situations, the issues were <br />looked at running either direction of boundaries through a sort of estoppel, <br />acquiescence or adverse possession and it was clear in the opinion of the City <br />Attorney's office, those principles don't run against the City. There is still the <br />discrepancy of where the fence sits in relation to the boundary lines under the original <br />deed, so a boundary line adjustment agreement is recommended. <br />Mayor Muckle noted this does not affect any other properties or set any new survey <br />points. <br />MOTION <br />Council member Keany moved to approve Ordinance No. 1721, Series 2016, Council <br />member Stolzmann seconded. Roll Call Vote 6 -0. Council member Maloney absent. <br />DISCUSSION /DIRECTION: OPEN SPACE RANKING ACQUISITION POLICY <br />City Manager Fleming gave the staff presentation noting the item came from Council <br />member's concerns about how the City ranks open space parcels to purchase. He <br />