Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 19, 2016 <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />Council member Stolzmann stated there are a great many complications in this project <br />and noted the site includes the rest of the property which is generating rent. She is <br />concerned the matching funds are not included. She stated she doesn't see it qualifying <br />for this source of funding at this time. <br />Council member Loo noted her appreciation for the applicant to do the project but has <br />concerns with this funding. She noted to date, the City has already provided <br />approximately $1.5 million in funding and this grant would bring that to $2 million. She <br />stated the cost of the immediate need is about $200,000 and that would still not make <br />the site usable. She wondered if Council members were interested in funding the <br />Priority 1 items. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he shared the concem of the fund's long -term viability, but the City <br />needs to see it through to at least full complete restoration (Priority 1) and he would <br />probably support Priority 2 as well. He noted the Council probably shouldn't do <br />something against the resolution rules but might be able to invest in the building while <br />we still own it. <br />Council member Maloney noted funding for the project is already higher than $2 million <br />when everything is included. He was surprised the protection items were not included <br />as part of the stabilization. He stated it is very complicated to make the building usable, <br />but higher matching funds really must be a part of the request. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if the Council would be willing to have staff bring back to the <br />Council a suggested solution that would not be against the existing ordinance. <br />Council member Leh stated he agrees with the concerns of others. The grant program <br />has rules and he doesn't feel comfortable going against that. The 12% match seems <br />significantly low. <br />Mayor Muckle suggested the City could put money towards the building at this time <br />while we still own it. Deputy City Manager Balser asked if he wanted to give HPF funds <br />or general fund money. He stated HPF. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the HPC did exactly what they were supposed to do under <br />their rules. He is concerned the $1.5 million invested is already a huge amount. The City <br />is taking all the financial risk without a high enough return. He stated he doesn't see an <br />end to the requests for money for the project. <br />Council member Stolzmann asked when the City will actually close on the property so it <br />is owned by the applicant. <br />City Manager Fleming stated there are a couple of outstanding items including the <br />grading around the site before closing can happen. Erik Hartronft added there are a few <br />