My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2016 08 09 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2016 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2016 08 09 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:24 PM
Creation date
8/16/2016 9:20:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B3
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2016 08 09 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 7, 2016 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked for paving to be discussed first as it will drive much of the <br />rest of the CIP discussion. He asked for another $1 million dollars to be put towards <br />paving in 2018. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked for the $2 5 million for the pavement booster that was <br />removed in 2018 should be put back in with cuts elsewhere. City Manager Fleming <br />stated that could be done but it would remove most all of the general government <br />capital items. <br />Councilmember Loo asked for information on how the impact fees are spent and if they <br />are dedicated to certain programs. Director Watson stated yes, they are dedicated and <br />they have to be spent on growth -related projects. If not spent in six years, the funds <br />have to be refunded. Councilmember Loo stated she wanted to be certain we are <br />spending the impact fees to the greatest extent allowable. Councilmember Keany asked <br />if in future presentations items that are paid for by impact fees be easily identifiable <br />Councilmember Loo asked that CIP projects associated with grant funds be clearly <br />identified on the CIP sheet. She added the maintenance costs for some projects aren't <br />clear. Director Watson noted the grant funds are only listed on the line items if a grant is <br />assured. If the funding is possible but is not already approved, that amount is not <br />included. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the city survey results showed street maintenance is <br />clearly the most important thing citizens are asking for and should be prioritized over <br />other things. <br />City Manager Fleming asked that as the group goes through projects they should be <br />clear what should be cut or pushed back, particularly if they want $2.5 million moved to <br />paving. <br />Mayor Muckle stated his belief that while residents want paving, it does not mean they <br />want everything else cut. It should be a high priority, but doesn't have to be done at the <br />expense of everything else <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he thought quiet zones could be moved to 2019 to help <br />fund paving. Deputy City Manager Balser noted most of the cost of that is grant funded, <br />the City's portion is about $300,000, not enough to fund paving. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton <br />asked if Burlington Northern will actually be available to do this in 2018. Deputy City <br />Manager Balser said this is a best guess <br />Councilmember Loo stated she would like all of the wayfinding removed. It is a great <br />deal of money and it is not a good use. City Manager Fleming stated based on the <br />previous budget discussion; he tried to remove wayfinding from most every request and <br />tried to put focus on the trail connections. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.