My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historical Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 08 03 JT
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORICAL MUSEUM ADVISORY BOARD (pka HISTORICAL COMMISSION)
>
2006-2019 Historical Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Historical Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historical Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 08 03 JT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:19 PM
Creation date
8/16/2016 9:50:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HCPKT 2016 08 03 JT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 41 of 150 <br />are made, or what the admission fee would be, is a decision for the City to make in the future. Up <br />to this point, staff had envisioned continuing the practice of not charging an admission fee so as <br />to welcome and encourage as much participation by the public in the Museum as possible, <br />particularly with respect to 1) the desire to promote and strengthen downtown and 2) the <br />recommendation by the Needs Assessment consultant that the Museum encourage visitors to <br />come to the Museum to share their stories. In fact, the Interpretive Theme Statement in the <br />Interpretive Plan draft that the Commission and Foundation have reviewed was written to state: <br />"The Louisville Historical Museum brings together people to share stories about Louisville." The <br />City may decide that there are compelling reasons for our public Museum, like the Public Library <br />that is the other division in the Department of Library & Museum Services, to not charge an <br />admission fee. <br />At the meeting, most who expressed a view stated that they do not like the idea of starting to <br />charge an admission unless perhaps it is for special exhibits. It was also felt that the ultimate <br />design of the Visitor Center building, the plans for exhibits in the Museum buildings, and the <br />overall design of the campus may or may not lend itself to the charging of an admission fee, since <br />there would be good reasons to not charge visitors coming to the Visitor Center and there would <br />need to be adequate areas for visitors to explore exhibits if an admission fee were to be charged <br />for part of the campus. It was also noted at the meeting that the Museum and Library are in the <br />same department and share a similar philosophy of serving the public need. <br />• Similarly, no decision has been made with respect to whether the Museum should charge for <br />either school tours of the Museum or Museum outreach into local schools. At this time, the <br />Museum does not charge schools a fee for either activity because of the educational mission <br />being an important foundation of the Museum's activities. <br />At the meeting, there was mixed reaction to this proposal in the Business Plan. Some were in <br />favor because many destinations do charge students for tours. <br />• The Business Plan includes a recommendation to generate funding of about $5000 per year by <br />having a museum store, as many museums have. Reasons why this may not be the best course of <br />action for our Museum include 1) the lack of adequate space to have a store that would generate <br />significant funding (and the necessity of giving up something else that is greatly needed at the <br />Museum, such as meeting space, exhibit space, or staff/volunteer work space, in order to create <br />such an area of a minimum of about 400 square feet) and 2) the possible desire to avoid the <br />appearance of competition with nearby downtown businesses selling similar items. <br />Those in attendance at the May meeting stated that the need to sacrifice important functions in <br />the new building to make room for a museum store would be highly undesirable, particularly <br />since the museum store would be expected to bring in so little funding per year for what would <br />be given up. <br />• The Business Plan envisions a much larger role for the Foundation and recommends that the <br />Foundation not only raise funds to assist with the specific capital project outlined in the Museum <br />Needs Assessment Report, which the Foundation directors have already anticipated working on, <br />but also that the Foundation would be heavily involved in significant fundraising to help the City <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.