My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 08 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LEGAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 08 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:20:38 PM
Creation date
8/16/2016 10:26:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LCPKT 2016 08 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Twentieth Judicial District Commission on Judicial Performance unanimously (10-0) <br />recommends that Judge John F. Stavely BE RETAINED. <br />Judge Stavely was appointed to the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial District on August <br />20, 2001. Prior to his appointment, Judge Stavely was partner in the Boulder firm. of Chrisman, <br />Bynum & Johnson, P.C., as well as the Presiding Judge of the Louisville Municipal Court. <br />Judge Stavely earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Colorado. He graduated <br />from University of North Dakota School of Law in 1978. Important to Judge Stavely is serving <br />community and his profession is his dedication to mentoring young lawyers and court <br />professionals. He has played a significant role in the Boulder County Extern Program. <br />The Commission observed Judge Stavely in court, reviewed his self-evaluation, written orders, <br />survey responses from attorneys and non -attorneys, conducted a personal interview with Judge <br />Stavely, and held a public hearing to solicit input from citizens. Regarding survey question of <br />retention, attorneys responding to the survey 90% recommended retaining, 6% not to retain, and <br />3% made no recommendation regarding retention. Of non -attorneys responding to the survey <br />91% recommended to retain, 6% not to retain, and 3% made no recommendation regarding <br />retention. (These percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.) Survey respondents, both <br />attorney and non -attorney ranked him higher in every measurement than other county judges. <br />Judge Stavely has presided over traffic 42%, misdemeanor 36%, and civil 22% cases during his <br />current term. Respondents listed his strengths as smart, fair, efficient, experienced, thoughtful, <br />and respectful. The Commission members after the personal interview and courtroom <br />observation gave Judge Stavely equally high marks for his case management, application and <br />knowledge of law, demeanor, fairness, and respect for attorneys and litigants. Judge Stavely <br />likes his judicial work and performs above expectations. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.