Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 2, 2016 <br />Page 11 of 15 <br />City Attorney Light noted conditions could be imposed with the rezoning and could be <br />reviewed during the PUD. The applicant could agree or disagree to the conditions. <br />Mr. Vasbinder noted a building could not be built on this site according to the <br />commercial guidelines. <br />Mayor Muckle called for public comment. <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Choke Cherry Drive noted it is important who the City <br />partners with. Etkin Johnson has been a good partner. He did not see services/retail <br />ever being built in CTC. He urged Council to approve and let staff and Etkin Johnson <br />move forward. Council will see the result at PUD. <br />Mayor Muckle called for Council comments. <br />r, <br />Council member Stolzmann went over the reasons to consider rezoning. She felt it <br />reasonable to zone it industrial and enforce the commercial design guidelines. <br />Council member Leh felt the public interest was to rezone it, but was hesitant to zone it <br />industrial and then try to impose commercial design guidelines. <br />Council member Maloney stated his support for the applicant. <br />Council member Loo noted life changes and plans can also, and -asked staff to take <br />Planning Commission's suggestion and to make sure any conditions are met. <br />Council member Keany remarked things have changed and supported enhancements <br />with landscaping and architecture to go above industrial guidelines. <br />Council member Stolzmann noted this is only for rezoning and all the other buildings <br />along this corridor have to follow the CDDSG. <br />Mr. Vasbinder recalled the reasoning and history was if the building at CTC was visible <br />from downtown, it should follow the commercial guidelines. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton <br />remembered designating it that way, too. He noted CTC is still an industrial park with <br />scattered retail/commercial. He was not sure he wanted to set a precedent by rezoning. <br />Mayor Muckle called for public comment and heard none. <br />City Attorney Light noted the items included as part of the public hearing: <br />All application materials submitted by the applicant in connection with the GDP <br />amendment rezoning application, all materials included in the City Council packet <br />consisting of the staff communication and all attachments included with that <br />communication, the public hearing notices and proof of publication and notice of this <br />