My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 08 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 08 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
8/31/2016 12:19:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2016 08 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 15, 2016 <br />Page 12 of 17 <br />I live directly to the south of this proposed project. I also own 310 Lilac Circle. I have known <br />these neighbors for a long time and fully support their project. We have a great community over <br />there and the fact that they came back is awesome. People who want to stay in these really <br />small houses is a good thing for Louisville. I am a licensed contractor and I went to school for <br />architecture and planning. The reason I am telling you this is that I have been looking at their <br />space planning and I think this is a really good plan. From a cost perspective, I think the project <br />could go out the window if this is denied and they have to go to east over the addition. It is a <br />very small bump out and it doesn't have any safety effects for driving around the corner. I look <br />at this side of the house every day. My mother lives in 310 Lilac Circle and she also approves of <br />the idea. I think from a cost perspective and design perspective, this is a good design for them. <br />They will be able to get what they need out of the use of the house. <br />DeJong says that as far as disclosure, you live across the street? <br />Eisen says I live on Lilac Circle, my mother lives next door, an.s .oth face the proposed <br />bump -out. We approve of this. <br />Jillena Eisen, 322 Lilac Circle, Louisville, CO <br />I want to echo what Rachel and Dan have said about t i•hborhoo• -ir reasons for being <br />there, and for being long-time residents. This particul ghborhood is long-time <br />residents. The neighbors they have behind them ar newest addition, P. timer and <br />Krista Eichten. Everyone around us has moved around sometimes from home •me, but it <br />has become a tight community. To have Rachel and Dan return, even though the had a home <br />of larger size, with four children, they knew they were making a choice of neighborhood over <br />convenience. I know this project is important to them. Their sanity is important to me. Giving <br />them a little more space in their home is an improvement for everyone. We anticipate being long <br />time homeowners and residents in this neighborhood. I speak on behalf of Ann Eisen who lives <br />next door to us. She told me to let you know of her support. Eric and I look out on that side of <br />the house every day and I believe the proposed changes will be a clear enhancement, both <br />practically and esthetically. I think it is a smart choice and reasonable use. They have a large <br />family and frankly, with this lot size, a small backyard. To bump out to the back actually removes <br />a significant portion of the backyard they have available to them. The trade-off of bumping out to <br />the street side is the only people who will notice it on any day will be us. It will increase their <br />ability for a bedroom and livable space in the house and it does not detract from their backyard, <br />I think is a smart choice. I notice with Criterion #2, we have been discussing these corner lots <br />and how they are smaller than the minimum. Whether there are a lot of them or a few of them, <br />having that 55' versus 65' is already a pinch. I am not sure it makes sense to throw out the <br />possibility of making more livable space simply because a long time ago, the corner lots all got <br />shorted. This is a good plan for good people. It only adds to our neighborhood and keeps <br />everybody happy. <br />Emails entered into the record: <br />Motion made by Stuart to enter a letter from Bob and Erin Hansel in support of the 346 <br />McKinley Court variance, seconded by DeJong. Motion passed by voice vote. <br />Public Present in Opposition of Application: None. <br />Public Hearing Closed / Board Discussion: <br />Stuart says Staff did an excellent job. I am taken with the idea that the tight corner lot is not <br />throughout the neighborhood. I am willing to think Criterion #2 is a pass because there is only a <br />handful of these lots and not throughout the neighborhood. On Criterion #3, I can understand <br />that this location is the right place to segregate another bedroom and the back side is not the <br />right side. This seems like a compelling reason. To reasonably develop the lot, you need the <br />extension there. I see Criterion #3 being passed. Besides that, it is a modest addition and the <br />neighbors don't mind it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.