My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 08 09 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 08 09 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
9/7/2016 8:21:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 08 09 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 9, 2016 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />Members discussed the CTC road connection. Councilmember Loo stated the City <br />should invest in this. Members didn't think this is a priority for the City to fund, but that <br />the CTC Owner's Association should pay for it. <br />Members agreed the South Boulder Road/Main Street underpass needs to be <br />discussed further and staff should continue to look for other revenue sources to pay for <br />it. <br />Members agreed the Dillon Road quiet zone should be included in the budget. Mayor <br />Muckle asked if the Council would be willing to pay for the quiet zone out of reserves if <br />no outside funding sources are identified and the railroad is ready to build them. All <br />members were in agreement. <br />Members discussed the South Boulder Road underpass. Everyone thinks it is important <br />but there was no agreement on how to fund it. <br />Members discussed options on how to create more revenue, but no specific direction <br />was given. Members agreed it should be discussed again at a later date. <br />BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TERMS LIMITS AND ABSENCES <br />Regarding absences Mayor Muckle suggested "unexcused" be defined or removed from <br />the resolution that defines cause. Councilmember Maloney asked if absences are a <br />significant problem for the boards. Mayor Muckle responded it is not pervasive but is not <br />trivial and is frequent enough it deserves Council attention. <br />Mayor Muckle stated the other item for discussion is if term limits are needed for <br />boards. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated unexcused doesn't need to be defined, but could be <br />removed. Missing 25% of the meetings is enough leeway for members. She agreed with <br />the suggestion to remove unexcused from the existing language. <br />Councilmember Leh noted the Council needs some discretion when to remove or not <br />remove someone from a board. This discretion needs to be limited to something like <br />medical issues and each person needs to be treated fairly and the reasons considered <br />individually. <br />There was consensus among the members to delete the word "unexcused" from the <br />definitions for cause. Members would like the proposed language to include some <br />discretion for the Council for medical and a small number of other outstanding issues. <br />Regarding Term Limits Councilmember Leh stated some boards really need very <br />experienced members and term limits can be an impediment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.