Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 16, 2016 <br />Page 6 of 12 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if the proposal is for a two-story building. Planner <br />Robinson said yes. Councilmember Stolzmann asked how leasing sidewalk space for <br />restaurant seating is different than leasing sidewalk space for loading and unloading of <br />an ADA parking space. Planner Robinson stated staffs concern that the loading space <br />takes up the entire sidewalk so no one can pass. This design also does not meet the <br />intent of the ADA requirements by forcing a handicapped user to use the sidewalk <br />rather than the regular parking lot. <br />Erik Hartronft, 950 Spruce Street, representative for the applicant, gave a presentation. <br />He noted this is a gateway property and is a transition space from the neighborhood to <br />downtown. The goal of the proposal is to provide a good pedestrian experience and <br />provide new office space and retail or restaurant space in downtown. He stated the <br />applicant felt keeping the house on the site was a better option than demolishing it for <br />additional parking. He stated the proposed building relates well in bulk and scale to the <br />rest of downtown. He added that while the parking requirement is not met, the applicant <br />feels this design maximizes parking as much as possible. He stated the design's use of <br />the sidewalk for the ADA space is a bit different, but it is a way to get one additional <br />accessible parking space in downtown. If it becomes a problem, the space can be <br />moved into the existing lot at the expense of one parking space. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if the amended resolution presented this evening meets <br />the needs of the applicant. Attorney Light noted the language in the amended resolution <br />includes the condition from the staff report. Hartronft stated the applicant is fine with the <br />amendments. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for public comments. There were none. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if the SRU applies to the upstairs patio. Planner <br />Robinson stated yes it includes both the ground level and the patio. He stated staff <br />would make a note on the SRU sheet to make it clear. She asked the City Attorney if <br />there are any issues with allowing the City's sidewalk to be used for the handicap <br />access to the parking space. <br />Attorney Light stated the City can give a license to a private owner to use the space on <br />the sidewalk. He stated it will require a licensing agreement with the City so it is clear <br />the City still owns the sidewalk and that there is no exclusive use for the property owner. <br />There is no legal reason to prohibit such use, but a licensing agreement will be needed <br />to memorialize the conditions of the use. <br />Councilmember Keany asked if music sound levels need to be addressed. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated his concern that this project adds to the parking <br />problem downtown although he supports the project. <br />